03rd Feb2012

Did Chinese Security Firm Snag Too Many American Security Secrets Before The Barn Door Closed?

by iSpit

Just how much of Symantec’s security code does and has Huawei had access to? And how much of a risk does that present to American interests?

Let me be upfront about this: I do not trust this Huawei company. On the one hand, they could be like any other enterprise, trying to sell their products all across the world. On the other hand, they have ties to the Chinese military and keep trying to insert themselves into America’s networking infrastructure.

A few years ago, they tried to buy supercomputer technology by acquiring the assets of 3Leaf Systems. They tried to acquire networking giant 3Com back in 2008. Then, in 2010, they tried toinsert themselves into the Sprint Nextel network.

In each of these cases, surprisingly wise heads in the U.S. government interceded and prevented the company’s incursion into our security infrastructure.

Now, you need to understand that while Huawei could be just another technology company, it probably isn’t. Their CEO is a former Chinese military officer, the company has known ties to the Chinese military, and — as we sadly know — there’s some concern about China’s behavior when it comes to the United States.

20th Jan2012

The True Origins Of The Infamous Swastika

by iSpit

As you may know, if you arrived here from the homepage, in support of the anti SOPA/PIPA movement I have posted the above picture which is a swastika with the acronym SOPA embedded in it with a link that leads to how you can help stop SOPA/PIPA from becomming harsh realities on the right sidebar. I also posted said picture as my profile picture on my personal facebook page  to which I have been met with major adversity. In the past 24 hours I have been called everything from a racist to a hate mongerer down to a “disgrace to my own race and Amerikkka” (I added the 3 k’s by creative license). A disgrace to Amerikkka? Maybe, but my own race?? Why? Is it because I compared the entertainment industry’s attempt to privatize & police the internet to (regular) Hitler & Nazi Germany‘s attempt to takeover the world? (No Pinky & The Brain)

I decided that instead of doing battle with my opposers, I would much rather educate the masses; those who have chosen to be educated rather than to blindly hate things they cannot comprehend.

Read below:

The swastika predates the ancient Egyptian symbol, the Ankh by Approximately 3,000 years (1000 BCE). The swastika was commonly used &  have been found on many artifacts such as pottery and coins dating from ancient Troy. During the following thousand years, the image of the swastika could be found in many cultures around the world, including in China, Japan, India, and southern Europe.

By the Middle Ages, the swastika was a well known, if not commonly used, symbol but was called by many different names: China (Wan), England (Fylfot), Germany (Hakenkreuz), Greece (Tetraskelion and gammadion), India (Swastika).

 

The swastika (Sanskrit: स्वस्तिक) is an equilateral cross with its arms bent at right angles, in either right-facing (卐) form in counterclockwise motion or its mirrored left-facing (卍) form in clockwise motion. Earliest archaeological evidence of swastika-shaped ornaments dates back to the Indus Valley Civilization of Ancient India as well as Classical Antiquity. Swastikas have also been used in other various ancient civilizations around the world. It remains widely used in Indian religions, specifically in Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism, primarily as a tantric symbol to evoke ‘shakti’ or the sacred symbol of auspiciousness. The swastika is also a Chinese character used in East Asia representing eternity and Buddhism.

The swastika is a repeating design, created by the edges of the reeds in a square basket-weave. Other theories attempt to establish a connection via cultural diffusion or an explanation along the lines of Carl Jung’s collective unconscious.

The genesis of the swastika symbol is often treated in conjunction with cross symbols in general, such as the sun cross of pagan Bronze Age religion. Beyond its certain presence in the “proto-writing” symbol systems emerging in the Neolithic nothing certain is known about the symbol’s origin. There are nevertheless a number of speculative hypotheses. One hypothesis is that the cross symbols and the swastika share a common origin in simply symbolizing the sun. Another hypothesis is that the 4 arms of the cross represent 4 aspects of nature – the sun, wind, water, soil. Some have said the 4 arms of cross are four seasons, where the division for 90-degree sections correspond to the solstices and equinoxes.The Hindus represent it as the Universe in our own spiral galaxy in the fore finger of Lord Vishu. This carries most significance in establishing the creation of the Universe and the arms as ‘kal’ or time, a calendar that is seen to be more advanced than the lunar calendar (symbolized by the lunar crescent common to Islam) where the seasons drift from calendar year to calendar year. The luni-solar solution for correcting season drift was to intercalate an extra month in certain years to restore the lunar cycle to the solar-season cycle. The Star of David is thought to originate as a symbol of that calendar system, where the two overlapping triangles are seen to form a partition of 12 sections around the perimeter with a 13th section in the middle, representing the 12 and sometimes 13 months to a year. As such, the Christian cross, Jewish hexagram star and the Muslim crescent moon are seen to have their origins in different views regarding which calendar system is preferred for marking holy days. Groups in higher latitudes experience the seasons more strongly, offering more advantage to the calendar represented by the swastika/cross.

Carl Sagan in his book Comet (1985) reproduces Han period Chinese manuscript (the Book of Silk, 2nd century BC) that shows comet tail varieties: most are variations on simple comet tails, but the last shows the comet nucleus with four bent arms extending from it, recalling a swastika. Sagan suggests that in antiquity a comet could have approached so close to Earth that the jets of gas streaming from it, bent by the comet’s rotation, became visible, leading to the adoption of the swastika as a symbol across the world. Bob Kobres in Comets and the Bronze Age Collapse (1992) contends that the swastika like comet on the Han Dynasty silk comet atlas was labeled a “long tailed pheasant star” (Di-Xing) because of its resemblance to a bird’s foot or track. Kobres goes on to suggest an association of mythological birds and comets also outside China.

In Life’s Other Secret (1999), Ian Stewart suggests the ubiquitous swastika pattern arises when parallel waves of neural activity sweep across the visual cortex during states of altered consciousness, producing a swirling swastika-like image, due to the way quadrants in the field of vision are mapped to opposite areas in the brain.

Alexander Cunningham suggested that the Buddhist use of the shape arose from a combination of Brahmi characters abbreviating the words su astí

Another early attestation is on pottery from the Samarra culture, dated to around 4000 BC. Joseph Campbell in an essay on The Neolithic-Paleolithic Contrast cites an ornament on a Late Paleolithic (10,000 BC) mammoth ivory bird figurine found near Kiev as the only known occurrence of such a symbol predating the Neolithic.

The swastika appears only very rarely in the archaeology of ancient Mesopotamia. It is found on prehistoric pottery, of which the Samarra bowl is the oldest known example, and on a number of early seal impressions, but then disappears from the record for the remainder of the Near Eastern Bronze Age.In India, Bronze Age swastika symbols were found at Lothal and Harappa, on Indus Valley seals.[

Swastikas have also been found on pottery in archaeological digs in Africa, in the area of Kush and on pottery at the Jebel Barkal temples,  in Iron Age designs of the northern Caucasus (Koban culture), and in Neolithic China in the Majiabang, Dawenkou and Xiaoheyan cultures. Other Iron Age attestations of the swastika can be associated with Indo-European cultures such as the Indo-Iranians, Celts, Greeks, Macedonians and Germanic peoples and Slavs. The Tierwirbel (the German for "animal whorl" or "whirl of animals") is a characteristic motive in Bronze Age Central Asia, the Eurasian Steppe, and later also in Iron Age Scythian and European (Baltic and Germanic) culture, showing rotational symmetric arrangement of an animal motive, often four birds' heads. Even wider diffusion of this "Asiatic" theme has been proposed, to the Pacific and even North America (especially Moundville).

The swastika is a historical sacred symbol both to evoke 'Shakti' in tantric rituals and evoke the gods for blessings in Indian religions. It first appears in the archaeological record here around 2500 BC in the Indus Valley Civilization. It rose to importance in Buddhism during the Mauryan Empire and in Hinduism with the decline of Buddhism in India during the Gupta Empire. With the spread of Buddhism, the Buddhist swastika reached Tibet and China. The symbol was also introduced to Balinese Hinduism by Hindu kings. The use of the swastika by the Bön faith of Tibet, as well as later syncretic religions, such as Cao Dai of Vietnam and Falun Gong of China, can also be traced to Buddhist influence.

BONUS:

"The Christian Cross is Evil for the Same Reasons as the Swastika"

The Swastika has had a glowing history for a thousand years. Representing the creative force of the sun, good luck, regenerative power, and was used by everyone pre-WW2 including by Rudyard Kipling, Coca Cola and American fighter pilots. It was used by all cultures in a positive way. In one decade however, the Nazis used it in a negative way, affecting all of society. As a result, those who are moral reactionaries protest whenever they see the swastika, because it reminds them of the bad things that happened in history.

 

The Christian Cross has the same contradictory history. Its history is that it was a symbol for good. But, like the swastika, it has been used for much evil. Not by one group, however, but by many. And not only for a decade, but for millennia. Europe was plunged into the dark ages, where Christian paranoia and "good will" turned European development backwards; torture, death and pain were inflicted across multiple European countries from a centralized Church. The history of the Cross contains a massive period of misuse, just like the history of the Swastika, even though both used to be symbols of good.

 

Now, those who use the swastika are largely neo-fascists who do not mind too much about its terrible history. Likewise, Christians who still use their cross must also be uncaring about the atrocities made in its name.

 

“If we are going to hate the image of the swastika, despite its history, just because one man who used the symbol was slightly off his rocker, then what about the cross? Many men have worn that symbol and been off their rockers as well!

This is more then wrong, it is ass backwards. The person wearing the swastika may or may not be a nazi, but even if they are, they have not killed anyone themselves, so where is the problem? The person wearing the cross I can guarantee believes in the word of Christ. He may not kill anyone himself, but he is wearing the symbol that is responsible for so many deaths in history. I don't see how we can hate one of these symbols and not the other. Either we need to see more swastikas or less crosses around. I have no problem with swastikas, but would rather not see them myself, so you can see which way I think we should go. What do you think?”

"The Swasticross" by Chaos
www.KillChrist.com [site down]

 

That’s the dilemma that Christians are in. If they condemn the use of good symbols that have been used for mass evil, then they must condemn both the swastika and the cross. If they admit that actually they are only symbols, and although they’ve been used for evil, they can still be used for good, then such people should accept usage of the swastika and usage of the Cross. Both symbols share the same paradoxes. A person can only reject one and accept the other for one reason: They don’t care about the people involved. So, Christians don’t really mind that many were tortured and burned by the Cross, and on the Cross, just like neo-Nazis don’t really care (or believe) that Jews were murdered en masse by proponents of the swastika.

 

16th Dec2011

Why The Crazy Copyright Bill Won’t Fix The Broken Web

by iSpit

The web may not be perfect, but SOPA is a reactionary bill to a broken copyright system. One thought alone: The ‘broken web’ is ironically what makes it work.

The Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) will starve the web of the oxygen that it needs, issue its marching orders and censor the U.S. web as we know it.

One finds it ironic as an outside observer, from a country that does not have freedom of speech as such, to a country that dubs itself the ‘Land of the Free’.

And this is coming from someone who thought the Patriot Act was bad enough.

With the realisation that the SOPA may actually pass through Congress and become law, one has to question why the sudden shift from copyright-ownership powers, to powers in government; seemingly a slippery slope to China-style censorship endorsements?

The copyright system is broken, but so is the web. While one system needs reform, the latter should remain broken — as long as the core principles of the web are adhered to.

The problem is: there are no rules of the web, only the rules of law. And, with a borderless, inter-connected network spanning all but about two countries on the planet, there will be fallout far-and-wide from this bill that threatens to bring online freedom of speech to an end.

Maria Pallante, head of the U.S. Copyright Office, said:

“It is my view that if Congress does not continue to provide serious responses to online piracy, the U.S. copyright system will ultimately fail.”

Is it that copyright, although admittedly damaging to certain industries, is being used as the excuse to instigate control over the Internet?

The Internet is more than a means of displaying information. It has exploded into a rapid, uncontrolled centre for communication, a vast network of information and data that the western community has complete access to. How long can we expect governmental structures not to try and bind its citizens?

When peer-to-peer networking first gained popular traction, particularly amongst the younger tech-savvy generations, all industries — including entertainment and music — had the chance to tweak their business models.

They had the opportunity to offer better value for money to their customers, who instead of waiting for staggered global release dates and the cost of $16.99 for a CD were suddenly able to share and download the same product within minutes for free.

No wonder it caught on.

Instead of changing with the times, the industries instead focused their efforts on trying to squash the insurgence. They tried the ’sacrificial goat approach’, charging individual ‘leechers’ — those who download but do not redistribute in turn – extortionate amounts of money that they would never be able to pay back.

The taking down of individual torrent sites that linked to the torrent file itself set a precedent where some website owners made a mockery of fractured, vague legal systems being imposed across borders; though it has not even begun to scratch the surface of the ‘endemic’ problem.

Governments worldwide are not focusing on the bigger picture. Instead, in a bid to satisfy the perverse Hollywood relationship the government has, it is not focusing on one very key outcome.

Citizens will not accept a government that censors the web.

To consider Pandora’s box theory, illegal copyright infringement, piracy, or ’stealing’, whatever you may call it, is ingrained into modern society to attempt to limit and control.

How would the general public react if the U.S. had a situation similar to the UK riots — which considering the economic state may not be such a fantasy? Would they calmly accept the restriction on Facebook or Twitter for an unspecified amount of time? A week? A month?

This could be ‘due cause’ to restrict and monitor social networking. Doesn’t this in turn limit how we can communicate, and if need be, organise public lobbying or peaceful protests?

Oh, hello China. Why are you smirking at us oh-so smugly?

It’s also amazing just how many people fighting for this bill aren’t versed in technology. Take Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas): “I’m not a technical expert on this”, he exclaims.

Would it not make more sense for the copyrighted material sharing ‘phenomena’ to be studied properly by technology experts, as the entire scenario relies on technology to make it possible?

The backlash will arguably definitively come from the younger generation. In reality, there are children still in high school who know more about programming and DNS entries than most of those arguing in Congress. Workarounds will be sought, discovered and widely accessed.

But who will enforce the ‘Great Firewall of America’: the copyright infringement police of Hollywood, or U.S. law enforcement? If it is the former rather than the latter, either way it routes at least some way into turning into the end-scene from V for Vendetta.

With the act handing over tremendous power to even small copyright holders, this could in turn cause online entrepreneurship to stagnate or even decline. Who would wants to spend time and money on a venture that could be shut down within a matter of days, whilst lawyers take their cut and argue over the issue?

Innovation may be exploding due to the freedom of the Internet and the rapid expansion of social media, but this bill could pinch out the flame.

SOPA is not about catching those who infringe copyright law.

It’s centered instead on the means to do it. The third-party who provides the service, such as a government regulator or even a private industry member — because governments do love to outsource, particularly in shady areas to distance itself from the judiciary — will mean that the Twitter’s, Facebook’s and the Tumblr’s of the world can immediately incur liability. Small businesses can be hit with bogus or difficult to prove copyright claims, and be shut down within days.

The average user will not be able to bypass the bill’s measures, but it is not the average user that infringes copyright on a mass level.

Beyond anything else, there is no solid evidence to suggest that without this bill, the copyright system will fail. It should be businesses that adapt their business model, and find a cure to a solution that it in part created.

Putting copyright into perspective and relative proportion.

The list of opponents to this bill runs down the length of my arm. Google, Facebook, LinkedIn, AOL, Yahoo!, eBay, Mozilla — and of course, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) — all oppose this bill and the measures it could enacts.

But instead of countering child abuse imagery, online terrorism and cybercrime, Hollywood is instead bidding its efforts on self-preservation amongst other things.

The web of politics that enmeshes economics, corporations and the public is well known and heavily documented. But something is heinously wrong when the balance of power shifts to the point where intended laws to protect the film and music industry are more severe, restricting and infringing of civil liberties than the laws set to prevent and report the spread of online child sexual abuse.

Putting a band-aid over a wound does not heal it. All in all, you cannot control something you do not understand the nature of.

But Congress will try anyway.

21st Oct2011

Philadelphia Exurb Ends Water Fluoridation

by iSpit

We can only hope that the recent surge in American communities voting to end water fluoridation is an omen to the eventual end of this abominable and toxic practice across the entire country. A recent report in the The Mercuryexplains that officials in Pottstown, Penn., a northwest exurb of Philadelphia with over 21,000 residents, have decided to stop fluoridating the borough’s public water supply.

Reports indicate that, despite the fact that not a single Pottstown resident showed up at any of the public hearings concerning fluoride, the Pottstown Borough Authority voted to remove the toxic chemical on its own, which it had been importing from China. Pottstown had been one of only a few communities in Pennsylvania that artificially fluoridate their water supplies.

Only one board member, Aram Ecker, opposed removing fluoride — and he did so, of course, using the same outdated and pseudo-scientific talking points peddled by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the American Dental Association (ADA), and others who continue to deny the numerous, more recent studies that show fluoride consumption causes brain damage, thyroid dysfunction, and other health problems (http://www.naturalnews.com/fluoride…).

The move will save Pottstown as much as $60,000 a year, which is roughly what it costs to import the liquid toxin from China, and lace it in the water supply. As a result, the borough’s water department workers will also no longer have to go through the intense handling procedures that are required when dealing with highly corrosive fluoride chemicals.

Pottstown’s decision came just one day after Spring Hill, Tenn., a suburb of Nashville, voted to remove fluoride from its water supply, which marks what appears to be the eventual decline of the chemical’s use across the US (http://www.tennessean.com/article/2…).

Sources for this story include:

http://www.pottsmerc.com/articles/2…

19th Sep2011

Chinese Actress Says She Was Forced To Spy For Chinese Regime

by iSpit

Chinese actress Shao Xiaoshan, 31, says the Chinese government has forced her to date the children of western diplomats to gather intelligence for them since she was 17.

According to NTD Television, Xiaoshan’s claims appeared on Sina Weibo and Tincent Weibo — two Chinese, Twitter-like sites.

Famous for her appearance as a body double in the 2006 film The Banquet, the actress says she was told to “control” the son of the French Ambassador when they
Shao Xiaoshan

Image: NTD
dated in 2007, was not paid for her spying, and was threatened with death if she disobeyed.

Asking to be taken in by western governments, she says she’s come forward in an effort to preemt being killed by the Chinese government. “I don’t want to die before no one knows why I’ve died,” she wrote.

Not everyone is buying her claims, with many thinking it could be a publicity stunt. No stranger to controversy, Xiaoshan was recently criticized for seeking a foreign husband online. Her response to critics was, “It’s not that I like foreigners, but because for all these years I’ve had no personal safety in China!!!”

22nd Jul2011

Japan System Crowned Supercomputer Champ As Petaflop Age Emerges

by iSpit

For the first time, the top 10 supercomputers in the world operate at a petaflop scale as China continues to move up the high-performance computing charts to chase the U.S.

Japan’s K Computer, which can crunch more than 8 quadrillion calculations per second, is the top supercomputer, according to the Top 500 list of high-performance systems.

The K Computer, housed at the RIKEN Advanced Institute for Computational Science in Kobe, puts Japan back in the top spot for the first time since Nov. 2004.

On Monday, the Top 500 list was outlined at the International Supercomputing Conference in Hamburg. These systems are ranked based on their Linpack scores, an application designed to solve dense linear equations.

The biggest takeaway on the list is that a system needs to operate at a petaflop per second scale to break the top 10. The U.S. has five systems operating at a petaflop scale, Japan and China have two each and France has one.

Japan’s K Computer bumped the previous top dog—China’s Tianhe-1A supercomputer. The K Computer is built by (more…)

12th Jul2011

Lagarde Takes Helm Of IMF Amid Major Challenges

by iSpit

Christine Lagarde can count on at least one thing Wednesday during her first news conference as chief of the International Monetary Fund: few softball questions.

The former French finance minister is under pressure on many fronts. Lagarde must convince the developing world that her IMF will be a more open place for non-Western nations. At the same time, she’ll have to persuade her fellow Europeans to take painful steps to avoid a default by Greece.

Lagarde is taking over after a scandal, so she will have to restore confidence in the institution. Dominique Strauss-Kahn, her predecessor, resigned in May to fight charges that he sexually assaulted a New York City hotel housekeeper.

If all that weren’t enough, Lagarde is the first woman to lead the global lending giant.

“The IMF top job has never been in the spotlight like it is now,” said Kevin Gallagher, a professor of international relations at Boston University.

Economists and former IMF officials say Lagarde would do well to make a few points clear when she answers questions Wednesday:

—- Take a tougher line with Europe. She should show a willingness to push her former European colleagues to accept that a default and restructuring of Greece‘s debt may be necessary. European governments fear such an approach would harm European banks, which have lent billions to Greece‘s government.

The European Union and IMF provided Greece with a $159 billion billion bailout package last year — a third of that came from the IMF. Greece has received more assistance from the IMF, relative to its size, than any country in history. That has caused some grumbling among developing countries about favorable treatment.

“She needs to make it clear that she’s taking off her French finance minister hat and putting on her global financial institutions hat,” Gallagher said.

—- Change the subject away from Greece. One way to show her break from Europe would be to discuss issues other than the continent’s debt problems. Many emerging economies, such as China and Brazil, are struggling with high inflation. They also want to know her plans for making the IMF a more open institution.

Eswar Prasad, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and former IMF official, said Lagarde could start by making a firm commitment to changing the governing structure. She should be willing to give emerging markets more voting rights and increased representation.

She could also commit to diversify the fund’s staff, both in gender and expertise. Gallagher said the staff is “stacked” with European and American economists. She could promise to add more economists from China, Brazil and other developing nations.

– Restore confidence in the institution. Lagarde will likely try to address the IMF‘s reputation as male-dominated and insensitive to the concerns of some female employees.

Lagarde “can pledge to make the place more gender-balanced, more respectful of people from different countries and backgrounds,” Gallagher said. “Those kinds of things are key signals.”

05th Jul2011

UK Pupils ‘Among Least Likely To Overcome Tough Start’

by iSpit

The UK performs poorly in an international league table showing how many disadvantaged pupils succeed “against the odds” at school.

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has studied how pupils from poor backgrounds can succeed academically.

It says that “self-confidence” is a key factor in whether such pupils succeed.

The UK comes behind Mexico and Tunisia in the table – with the top places taken by Asian

countries.

Social mobility

The study comes amid concerns in the UK about a lack of social mobility.

The study from the international economic organisation looks at whether there is an inevitable link between disadvantaged backgrounds and a cycle of poor school results and limited job prospects.

The OECD study says that this is not the case for many pupils from poor homes – with an international average of 31% (more…)

04th Jul2011

Happy Dependence Day, Amerikkka! Love, China

by iSpit

Oh say can you see…the end of American independence?

This Fourth of July, the United States celebrates its 235th year of freedom from British rule. That’s emancipated us from yeasty marmite, pesky ‘u’s in our ‘neighbors’ and from having to ask God to “save the Queen”.

Phew. Yes, today we celebrate our independence from Britain.

But we do that by underlining our growing dependence on another country – China. And with our most patriotic of Americana for the day – fireworks and flags.

Nearly 97% of U.S. money for firework imports popped up in China last year, according to U.S. trade statistics. The hard numbers: we paid nearly $200 million for all of our skyrockets, Roman candles, sparklers and other pyrotechnics. More than $190 million of that went to the Middle Kingdom.

As for the Stars and Stripes, about 88% of our money for American flag imports billowed over to China in 2010.  U.S. foreign trade statistics show that the U.S. imported $3.2 million worth of flags, and $2.8 million of that went to our top (more…)

01st Jul2011

A Common Ingredient In Commercial Breads is Derived From Human Hair Harvested in China

by iSpit

If you read the ingredients label on a loaf of bread, you will usually find an ingredient listed there as L-cysteine. This is a non-essential amino acid added to many baked goods as a dough conditioner in order to speed industrial processing. It’s usually not added directly to flour intended for home use, but you’ll find it throughout commercial breads such as pizza dough, bread rolls and pastries.

While some L-cysteine is directly synthesized in laboratories, most of it is extracted from a cheap and abundant natural protein source: human hair. The hair is dissolved in acid and L-cysteine is isolated through a chemical process, then packaged and shipped off to commercial bread producers. Besides human hair, other sources of L-cysteine include chicken feathers, duck feathers, cow horns and petroleum byproducts.

Most of the hair used to make L-cysteine is gathered from the floors of barbershops and hair salons in China, by the way.

While the thought of eating dissolved hair might make some people uneasy, most Western consumers ultimately have no principled objections doing so. For Jews and Muslims, however, hair-derived L-cysteine poses significant problems. Muslims are forbidden from eating anything derived from a human body, and many rabbis forbid hair consumption for similar reasons. Even rabbis who permit the consumption of hair would forbid it if it came from corpses — and since much L-cysteine comes from China, where (more…)

Pages:12345»

Switch to our mobile site