23rd Jan2012

Lost, Abused And Neglected For A Profit (Video)

by iSpit


Download Video or MP3 -Iamnotarapperispit.com

Take a stand against the private prison racket: http://immigrantsforsale.org
Discuss @ facebook.com/cuentame

Guillermo Gomez-Sanchez is a 50 year old legal resident with a mental disability. In 2004 Gomez was detained because of a dispute at a grocery store over a bag of tomatoes.

Guillermo spent 2 years at a private CCA (Corrections Corporation of America) detention facility – the corporation neglected to report his medical condition.

CCA profited close to $90,000 off of Gomez’ incarceration, and ensured greater profit by failing to disclose his mental disability effectively leaving Guillermo trapped for 2 years. In 2010 CCA CEO Damon T. Hininger received $3,266,387 in total compensations.




It’s time to put an end to the private prison racket. How many more are suffering lost in a system that values profit over justice? Join the discussion on Facebook today: facebook.com/cuentame

20th Jan2012

The True Origins Of The Infamous Swastika

by iSpit

As you may know, if you arrived here from the homepage, in support of the anti SOPA/PIPA movement I have posted the above picture which is a swastika with the acronym SOPA embedded in it with a link that leads to how you can help stop SOPA/PIPA from becomming harsh realities on the right sidebar. I also posted said picture as my profile picture on my personal facebook page  to which I have been met with major adversity. In the past 24 hours I have been called everything from a racist to a hate mongerer down to a “disgrace to my own race and Amerikkka” (I added the 3 k’s by creative license). A disgrace to Amerikkka? Maybe, but my own race?? Why? Is it because I compared the entertainment industry’s attempt to privatize & police the internet to (regular) Hitler & Nazi Germany‘s attempt to takeover the world? (No Pinky & The Brain)

I decided that instead of doing battle with my opposers, I would much rather educate the masses; those who have chosen to be educated rather than to blindly hate things they cannot comprehend.

Read below:

The swastika predates the ancient Egyptian symbol, the Ankh by Approximately 3,000 years (1000 BCE). The swastika was commonly used &  have been found on many artifacts such as pottery and coins dating from ancient Troy. During the following thousand years, the image of the swastika could be found in many cultures around the world, including in China, Japan, India, and southern Europe.

By the Middle Ages, the swastika was a well known, if not commonly used, symbol but was called by many different names: China (Wan), England (Fylfot), Germany (Hakenkreuz), Greece (Tetraskelion and gammadion), India (Swastika).

 

The swastika (Sanskrit: स्वस्तिक) is an equilateral cross with its arms bent at right angles, in either right-facing (卐) form in counterclockwise motion or its mirrored left-facing (卍) form in clockwise motion. Earliest archaeological evidence of swastika-shaped ornaments dates back to the Indus Valley Civilization of Ancient India as well as Classical Antiquity. Swastikas have also been used in other various ancient civilizations around the world. It remains widely used in Indian religions, specifically in Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism, primarily as a tantric symbol to evoke ‘shakti’ or the sacred symbol of auspiciousness. The swastika is also a Chinese character used in East Asia representing eternity and Buddhism.

The swastika is a repeating design, created by the edges of the reeds in a square basket-weave. Other theories attempt to establish a connection via cultural diffusion or an explanation along the lines of Carl Jung’s collective unconscious.

The genesis of the swastika symbol is often treated in conjunction with cross symbols in general, such as the sun cross of pagan Bronze Age religion. Beyond its certain presence in the “proto-writing” symbol systems emerging in the Neolithic nothing certain is known about the symbol’s origin. There are nevertheless a number of speculative hypotheses. One hypothesis is that the cross symbols and the swastika share a common origin in simply symbolizing the sun. Another hypothesis is that the 4 arms of the cross represent 4 aspects of nature – the sun, wind, water, soil. Some have said the 4 arms of cross are four seasons, where the division for 90-degree sections correspond to the solstices and equinoxes.The Hindus represent it as the Universe in our own spiral galaxy in the fore finger of Lord Vishu. This carries most significance in establishing the creation of the Universe and the arms as ‘kal’ or time, a calendar that is seen to be more advanced than the lunar calendar (symbolized by the lunar crescent common to Islam) where the seasons drift from calendar year to calendar year. The luni-solar solution for correcting season drift was to intercalate an extra month in certain years to restore the lunar cycle to the solar-season cycle. The Star of David is thought to originate as a symbol of that calendar system, where the two overlapping triangles are seen to form a partition of 12 sections around the perimeter with a 13th section in the middle, representing the 12 and sometimes 13 months to a year. As such, the Christian cross, Jewish hexagram star and the Muslim crescent moon are seen to have their origins in different views regarding which calendar system is preferred for marking holy days. Groups in higher latitudes experience the seasons more strongly, offering more advantage to the calendar represented by the swastika/cross.

Carl Sagan in his book Comet (1985) reproduces Han period Chinese manuscript (the Book of Silk, 2nd century BC) that shows comet tail varieties: most are variations on simple comet tails, but the last shows the comet nucleus with four bent arms extending from it, recalling a swastika. Sagan suggests that in antiquity a comet could have approached so close to Earth that the jets of gas streaming from it, bent by the comet’s rotation, became visible, leading to the adoption of the swastika as a symbol across the world. Bob Kobres in Comets and the Bronze Age Collapse (1992) contends that the swastika like comet on the Han Dynasty silk comet atlas was labeled a “long tailed pheasant star” (Di-Xing) because of its resemblance to a bird’s foot or track. Kobres goes on to suggest an association of mythological birds and comets also outside China.

In Life’s Other Secret (1999), Ian Stewart suggests the ubiquitous swastika pattern arises when parallel waves of neural activity sweep across the visual cortex during states of altered consciousness, producing a swirling swastika-like image, due to the way quadrants in the field of vision are mapped to opposite areas in the brain.

Alexander Cunningham suggested that the Buddhist use of the shape arose from a combination of Brahmi characters abbreviating the words su astí

Another early attestation is on pottery from the Samarra culture, dated to around 4000 BC. Joseph Campbell in an essay on The Neolithic-Paleolithic Contrast cites an ornament on a Late Paleolithic (10,000 BC) mammoth ivory bird figurine found near Kiev as the only known occurrence of such a symbol predating the Neolithic.

The swastika appears only very rarely in the archaeology of ancient Mesopotamia. It is found on prehistoric pottery, of which the Samarra bowl is the oldest known example, and on a number of early seal impressions, but then disappears from the record for the remainder of the Near Eastern Bronze Age.In India, Bronze Age swastika symbols were found at Lothal and Harappa, on Indus Valley seals.[

Swastikas have also been found on pottery in archaeological digs in Africa, in the area of Kush and on pottery at the Jebel Barkal temples,  in Iron Age designs of the northern Caucasus (Koban culture), and in Neolithic China in the Majiabang, Dawenkou and Xiaoheyan cultures. Other Iron Age attestations of the swastika can be associated with Indo-European cultures such as the Indo-Iranians, Celts, Greeks, Macedonians and Germanic peoples and Slavs. The Tierwirbel (the German for "animal whorl" or "whirl of animals") is a characteristic motive in Bronze Age Central Asia, the Eurasian Steppe, and later also in Iron Age Scythian and European (Baltic and Germanic) culture, showing rotational symmetric arrangement of an animal motive, often four birds' heads. Even wider diffusion of this "Asiatic" theme has been proposed, to the Pacific and even North America (especially Moundville).

The swastika is a historical sacred symbol both to evoke 'Shakti' in tantric rituals and evoke the gods for blessings in Indian religions. It first appears in the archaeological record here around 2500 BC in the Indus Valley Civilization. It rose to importance in Buddhism during the Mauryan Empire and in Hinduism with the decline of Buddhism in India during the Gupta Empire. With the spread of Buddhism, the Buddhist swastika reached Tibet and China. The symbol was also introduced to Balinese Hinduism by Hindu kings. The use of the swastika by the Bön faith of Tibet, as well as later syncretic religions, such as Cao Dai of Vietnam and Falun Gong of China, can also be traced to Buddhist influence.

BONUS:

"The Christian Cross is Evil for the Same Reasons as the Swastika"

The Swastika has had a glowing history for a thousand years. Representing the creative force of the sun, good luck, regenerative power, and was used by everyone pre-WW2 including by Rudyard Kipling, Coca Cola and American fighter pilots. It was used by all cultures in a positive way. In one decade however, the Nazis used it in a negative way, affecting all of society. As a result, those who are moral reactionaries protest whenever they see the swastika, because it reminds them of the bad things that happened in history.

 

The Christian Cross has the same contradictory history. Its history is that it was a symbol for good. But, like the swastika, it has been used for much evil. Not by one group, however, but by many. And not only for a decade, but for millennia. Europe was plunged into the dark ages, where Christian paranoia and "good will" turned European development backwards; torture, death and pain were inflicted across multiple European countries from a centralized Church. The history of the Cross contains a massive period of misuse, just like the history of the Swastika, even though both used to be symbols of good.

 

Now, those who use the swastika are largely neo-fascists who do not mind too much about its terrible history. Likewise, Christians who still use their cross must also be uncaring about the atrocities made in its name.

 

“If we are going to hate the image of the swastika, despite its history, just because one man who used the symbol was slightly off his rocker, then what about the cross? Many men have worn that symbol and been off their rockers as well!

This is more then wrong, it is ass backwards. The person wearing the swastika may or may not be a nazi, but even if they are, they have not killed anyone themselves, so where is the problem? The person wearing the cross I can guarantee believes in the word of Christ. He may not kill anyone himself, but he is wearing the symbol that is responsible for so many deaths in history. I don't see how we can hate one of these symbols and not the other. Either we need to see more swastikas or less crosses around. I have no problem with swastikas, but would rather not see them myself, so you can see which way I think we should go. What do you think?”

"The Swasticross" by Chaos
www.KillChrist.com [site down]

 

That’s the dilemma that Christians are in. If they condemn the use of good symbols that have been used for mass evil, then they must condemn both the swastika and the cross. If they admit that actually they are only symbols, and although they’ve been used for evil, they can still be used for good, then such people should accept usage of the swastika and usage of the Cross. Both symbols share the same paradoxes. A person can only reject one and accept the other for one reason: They don’t care about the people involved. So, Christians don’t really mind that many were tortured and burned by the Cross, and on the Cross, just like neo-Nazis don’t really care (or believe) that Jews were murdered en masse by proponents of the swastika.

 

18th Jan2012

US Congressmen Ask FTC To Investigate Facebook Cookies

by iSpit

Two US congressmen today asked the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to investigate recent accusations that Facebook tracks its users even after they log out of the social network, an issue the company says it has since fixed. Edward Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat, and Joe Barton, a Texas Republican, want the FTC to take a closer look at Facebook’s business practices.

You can read the full two-page letter yourself: FTC Facebook Letter – September 28, 2011 (PDF). I’ve also typed up the relevant excerpt below:

Facebook has admitted to collecting information about its users even after its users had logged out of Facebook. Facebook was able to obtain this information when users visited websites that connect with Facebook, including websites with “Like” buttons. There are an estimated 905,000 sites that contain the “Like” button.

As co-Chairs of the Congressional Bi-Partisan Privacy Caucus, we believe that tracking user behavior without their consent or knowledge raises serious privacy concerns. When users log out of Facebook, they are under the expectation that Facebook is no longer monitoring their activities. We believe this impression should be the reality. Facebook users should not be tracked without their permission.

This past weekend, self-proclaimed hacker Nik Cubrilovic accused Facebook of tracking its users even if they log out of the social network. He explained that even after logging out of the service, whenever he visited a website that had a Facebook plugin, information including his account ID was still being sent to Palo Alto.

The company responded by denying the claims and offering an explanation as to why its cookies behave the way they do. The company explained that it does not track users across the Web and its cookies are used to personalize content. As for the logged-out cookies, Facebook said they are used for safety and protection.

Yesterday, Cubrilovic said Facebook made changes to the logout process, and that the cookies in question now behave as they should. They still exist, but they no longer send back personally-identifiable information after you log out. The company also took the time to explain what each cookie is responsible for.

Cubrilovic offered the following conclusion to the whole fiasco:

Facebook has changed as much as they can change with the logout issue. They want to retain the ability to track browsers after logout for safety and spam purposes, and they want to be able to log page requests for performance reasons etc. I would still recommend that users clear cookies or use a separate browser, though. I believe Facebook when they describe what these cookies are used for, but that is not a reason to be complacent on privacy issues and to take initiative in remaining safe.

Facebook engineer Gregg Stefancik made this concluding statement in a comment on this blog:

I’m an engineer who works on these systems. I want to make it clear that there was no security or privacy breach. Facebook did not store or use any information it should not have. Like every site on the internet that personalizes content and tries to provide a secure experience for users, we place cookies on the computer of the user. Three of these cookies on some users’ computers included unique identifiers when the user had logged out of Facebook. However, we did not store these identifiers for logged out users. Therefore, we could not have used this information for tracking or any other purpose. In addition, we fixed the cookies so that they won’t include unique information in the future when people log out.

13th Dec2011

European Law Stops Facebook Selling Personal Information To Advertisers W/O Permission

by iSpit

Facebook will face a new legal challenge from Europe with the Telegraph reporting that a new law will prohibit the company from using users’ information to produce bespoke advertising.

The new directive from the European Commission would mean that Facebook would be unable to sell individuals’ information to advertisers without permission. If the social network failed to comply with the new law, expected to be introduced in January, it could face legal action or a large fine.

Facebook responded to the news with a statement, telling the Telegraph:

“We can show relevant ads in a way that respects individual privacy because our system only provides advertisers with anonymous and aggregate information for the purpose of targeting ads.”

“We do not share people’s names with an advertiser without a person’s explicit consent and we never sell personal information to third parties.”

Additionally, other tech titans such as Microsoft and Google have spoken out against any directive to tighten online privacy to the extreme. Bloomberg reports that the two aforementioned companies have warned the European Union that incredibly strict privacy rules would harm technology development on the continent.

07th Dec2011

Is Facebook Building Non-User Profiles?

by iSpit

Ireland‘s Data Protection Commissioner filed a lawsuit against Facebook in August claiming that the social network is creating “extensive profiles”of non-users with information gleaned from the profiles of its 800 million users.

“Facebook Ireland is gathering excessive amounts of information about data subjects without notice or consent by the data subject,” the filing reads.

Facebook categorically denies the claim.

“The allegations are false,” Facebook spokesman Andrew Noyes told FoxNews.com. “We enable you to send emails to your friends, inviting them to Facebook. We keep the invitee’s email address and name to let you know when they join the service. This practice is common among almost all services that involve invitations — from document sharing to event planning.”

This is not the first time such an allegation has occurred. In 2007, consumer watch groups claimed Beacon was collecting and storing non-member user data as well. Facebook also denied that those transgressions were happening.

And it’s likely there is not anything to the latest claim, either.

But as Facebook grows larger and people store more and more information on its servers about themselves and their friends, this will continue to be an issue for Mark Zuckerberg and the company.

27th Nov2011

Facebook Porn and Gore Exploit Spiraling Out Of Control

by iSpit

For the past few days an exploit has been hijacking Facebook users accounts and posting explicit gore and pornography to users’ timelines.

Facebook users’ outrage is mounting toward the social network for an exploit that is currently turning unsuspecting users’ newsfeeds into unstoppable torrents of hardcore pornography and gory, violent pictures.

UPDATE: Facebook now claims to have closed its browser exploit and cleaned up the spam. Facebook had confirmed the problemNovember 15th and assented that the gore-porn-linkspam exploit is a coordinated attack and their engineers were “working on the self-XSS vulnerability in the browser.” If your account has been compromised try this tutorial to fix it. /Update

It started a few days ago, and right now is becoming an out of control exploit that has users angry and disgusted, while seemingly mocking Facebook’s notorious conservative content controls.

Earlier today the Christian Post published an outraged and disgusted item saying that Facebook had become a pit for violent and pornographic photos – and as it turns out, they were among the first to detail an exploit that is turning Facebook into the graphic horror of 4Chan/b.

A linkspam virus with the usual bait – Kim Kardashian, etc. – is luring users into clicking media-rich links, now more available thanks to Facebook’s recent timeline upgrades. Once clicked, their feeds become vectors for images containing hardcore sex, extreme violence, gore and death.

Many people are pointing fingers at Anonymous, but no claim has been made for the attack.

Anon is more than a whipping post for this one; a while back Anonymous announced intentions to take Facebook out for a variety of reasons, with a November 5 attack of some kind in the works, and rumors of a “Guy Fawkes virus” – none of which have been confirmed via usual routes (such as Anon press releases).

No matter who is behind it, the Facebook attack is extreme, and spiraling out of control.

On Twitter, Facebook users are venting no small amount of disgust – not necessarily at the porn, but most certainly at the bashed-in heads of corpses, photos of dead babies and animals, and yes, the overlarge penises and graphic scenes of penetration that have flooded streams.

The style of images is very much along the lines of 4Chan/b, which is where the genesis of Anonymous occurred.

For many it is too much, and users are avoiding the site and facing down the chore of deactivating their accounts to prevent assaulting friends, family and coworkers with unwanted imagery.

According to realtime search on Twitter, the Christian Post and now Gawker, the gore-porn virus has been gathering steam for the past few days.

Having your feed hijacked with gross stuff is no walk in the park, though some of us are less troubled by adult imagery than others. Facebook itself is known for being far more prudish than most of its users. That’s worth nothing when looking at the overall attack.

Meaning, while I tire of Facebook’s hypocrisies around adult content, it is quite a comment to see an exploit enacted with a bizarrely clever slap at the one thing Facebook is such an extreme hypocrite about.

The content of the imagery in its context was obviously well considered. In this, if intentional, this seems to me a much more direct attack on Facebook – the company – rather than an attack on its users.

So if you see your boss, your granny, or Sarah Palin posting hardcore porn or dead kittens on Facebook – you can blame it on the exploit. For now.

23rd Nov2011

I Am Not A Rapper Presents: ___ Podcast – Season 1,Episode 2 – #ThePodcastAboutNothing

by iSpit
Play

Aaand we’re back with another podcast full of random goodies. This past Sunday in our nerd laboratory we had a group discussion about six headlines in today’s media (including the words of the day). Our group discussion featured Ms. Melissa x Ms. Si x Kevin Golden x Spit x Mr. Blair which = Headline Anarchy. Once we hit the record button, this was what happened…

Topics discussed: #OccupyPhilly (& #OccupyPhilly) + Barack Obama + Facebook + CIA + Penn State + Rainbow Ranger + Ringtones + Benches and Ninjas + Spanish Television + Tyler Perry vs. Tyler the Creator + Mortal Kombat + etc.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  

Featured Music:   1.) Young Jeezy Feat Jay-Z x Andre 3000 – I Do    2.) Chiddy Bang – Ray Charles   3.) Matt x Kim – Wires

BTW: IF ANY OF YOU HAVE ANY IDEA WHAT THE PURPOSE OF OCCUPY WALLSTREET OR OCCUPY PHILLY ARE ABOUT PLEEEEEASE COMMENT OR EMAIL US & ENLIGHTEN US… BECAUSE WE HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO CLUE!

T0p 10 Ringtones From #OccupyPhilly

1. Puff Daddy & The Family – Mo’ Money Mo Problems

2. Big Tymers - Number 1 Stunna

3. Will Smith Feat Sisqo - Wild Wild West

4. Jay- Z Feat Jermaine Dupri - Money Aint A Thang

5. Ma$e x Puff Daddy - Cant Nobody Hold Me Down

6. Chapter – Swipe Yo EBT

7. Puff Daddy Feat Jimmy Page – Come With Me

8. Kanye West – You Cant Tell Me Nothing

9. Luniz – I Got Five On It

10.  Young Jeezy - I Get Alotta Dat

17th Nov2011

Black Men Across America Organize National Strategic Planning Summits For Black Male Achievement

by iSpit

Under the inspiration of Muhammad Ali‘s “float like a butterfly, sting like a bee; Rumble Young Man Rumble” rallying cry, major urban cities will strategize to address issues of Black Male achievement in their own communities on November 12th.   “We spend an awful amount of time laboring over the sobering and tragic statistics facing black males,” says Kenneth Braswell, Executive Director of Fathers Incorporated. “As black men, we are way overdue to do something about it and to stop just talking about and waiting for someone to rescue us.”

“We are the leaders, we’ve been waiting for,” says Shawn Dove, Campaign Manager for the Campaign for Black Male Achievement at the Open Society Foundations. Major urban cities across the nation are far from claiming victory for Black Male achievement. Double digit unemployment rates, incarceration, health disparities, low educational obtainment figures and violence are just a short list of items yet to be addressed for this population of men. Even as America‘s frustration with the economics of our country continue to bubble under, movements like the Tea Party, Occupy Wall Street and other activities to address poverty are still leaving black males behind.

In Louisville, Kentucky last month the Open Society Foundations hosted over 75 leaders from around the country who gathered to address how they would mobilize efforts using the spirit of the Muhammad Ali center and his legacy of principles. Muhammad Ali was quoted to say, “Impossible is just a big word thrown around by small men who find it easier to live in the world they’ve been given than to explore the power they have to change it. Impossible is not a fact. It’s an opinion. Impossible is not a declaration. It’s a dare. Impossible is potential. Impossible is temporary. Impossible is nothing.” It is that sentiment that has inspired this recent urgency of work.

 

“Much of why this work is so critical can be seen right here in Chicago where more Black children died in Chicago from gunfire in 2008 than Chicago soldiers died in Iraq,” says Phillip Jackson, President of The Black Star Project. In addition to high levels of violence, 50 % of all Black men between the ages of 16 and 64 years old are jobless. “These numbers are devastating our families and destroying our communities; and not unique to just Chicago,” continues Jackson.

 

In addition to the day of planning; there will be a 10-city role call via video conference to introduce, share information and explore solutions with the 25 men from each city. Afterward a report will be compiled in order to capsulate strategies that will address the multi issues facing the nations Black Males. THE FOLLOWING CITIES HAVE SIGNED ON SO FAR: 1) Albany, New York, 2) Atlanta, Georgia, 3) Baltimore, Maryland, 4) Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 5) Chicago, Illinois, 6) Cincinnati, Ohio, 7) Jackson, Mississippi, 8) Louisville, Kentucky, 9) Los Angeles, California, 10) Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 11) Newark, New Jersey, 12) New York City, New York, 13) Omaha, Nebraska; 14) Peoria, Illinois; 14) Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 15) Phoenix, Arizona, 16) San Bernardino, California and 17) Washington, D.C.

 

We are encouraging your city to participate in addressing issues affecting Black Males in your community. For information on how your city can be involved in this national campaign and receive a organizing kit; please call 773.285.9600 or email The Black Star Project atblackstar1000@ameritech.net. ON FACEBOOKhttps://www.facebook.com/RumbleYMR

13th Nov2011

LxE For The Uncool – OG Champion Hoodie (Raekwon Tribute) Feat. Nemo Achida

by iSpit

LxE For The Uncool ft. Nemo Achida- OG Champion Hoodie (Raekwon Tribute) from Walter Nini on Vimeo.

LxE For The Uncool
twitter.com/​#!/​LxEfortheuncool
facebook.com/​LxEfortheUncool

Directed by Walter Nini
walternini.com/​

10th Nov2011

Facebook: Releasing Your Personal Data To YOU “Reveals Our Trade Secrets”

by iSpit

An Austrian group called Europe versus Facebook has so far made 22 complaints regarding the social network’s practices. In the process, the organization has stumbled upon an important tidbit: Facebook says it is not required to give you a copy of some of your personal data if it deems doing so would adversely affect its trade secrets or intellectual property.

On its website, Europe versus Facebook shows how to request a copy of your personal data on the social network. It explains that because of Ireland’s 1988 Data Protection Act (DPA), Facebook has to send you your data on a CD within 40 days of a request.

The organization managed to accidentally get Reddit involved, whose users recently overwhelmed Facebook with data requests by following a slightly altered version of the instructions. The company was forced to e-mail all users requesting data to say it was experiencing a significant delay in processing the requests and will be unlikely to respond within 40 days of the initial request.

Before Reddit found out about Facebook’s request tool, Max Schrems of Europe versus Facebook managed to receive a reply to his request. It was in the form of a CD-ROM storing over 1,222 pages. As he looked through the ridiculously long document however, Schrems noticed that important information was missing, and so he contacted Facebook again asking for the remaining data. Here’s Facebook response:

Dear Mr. Schrems:

We refer to our previous correspondence and in particular your subject access request dated July 11, 2011 (the Request).

To date, we have disclosed all personal data to which you are entitled pursuant to Section 4 of the Irish Data Protection Acts 1988 and 2003 (the Acts).

Please note that certain categories of personal data are exempted from subject access requests.
Pursuant to Section 4(9) of the Acts, personal data which is impossible to furnish or which can only be furnished after disproportionate effort is exempt from the scope of a subject access request. We have not furnished personal data which cannot be extracted from our platform in the absence of is proportionate effort.

Section 4(12) of the Acts carves out an exception to subject access requests where the disclosures in response would adversely affect trade secrets or intellectual property. We have not provided any information to you which is a trade secret or intellectual property of Facebook Ireland Limited or its licensors.

Please be aware that we have complied with your subject access request, and that we are not required to comply with any future similar requests, unless, in our opinion, a reasonable period of time has elapsed.

Thanks for contacting Facebook,
Facebook User Operations Data Access Request Team

When Reddit users started getting e-mails from Facebook about a delay for their data requests, Schrems got one as well. He also got the response above, but I only picked up on it now, after TechDirt linked to the a PDF of both e-mails.

It’s worth noting that also last month, Billy Hawkes, Ireland’s Data Protection Commissioner, announced that he will conduct a privacy audit of Facebook’s activities. Since Facebook’s international headquarters is in Dublin, all users outside the US and Canada could be affected by his findings.

His office decided to investigate the company after Europe versus Facebook’s 22 complaints were covered repeatedly in the media. For reference again, here are all the complaints:

  1. Pokes are kept even after the user “removes” them.
  2. Facebook is collecting data about people without their knowledge. This information is used to substitute existing profiles and to create profiles of non-users.
  3. Tags are used without the specific consent of the user. Users have to “untag” themselves (opt-out). Note: Facebook has announced changes for this.
  4. Facebook is gathering personal data e.g. via its iPhone-App or the “friend finder”. This data is used by Facebook without the consent of the data subjects.
  5. Postings that have been deleted showed up in the set of data that was received from Facebook.
  6. Users cannot see the settings under which content is distributed that they post on other’s pages.
  7. Messages (incl. Chat-Messages) are stored by Facebook even after the user “deleted” them. This means that all direct communication on Facebook can never be deleted.
  8. The privacy policy is vague, unclear and contradictory. If European and Irish standards are applied, the consent to the privacy policy is not valid. Facebook tried improving it earlier this year.
  9. The new face recognition feature is an disproportionate violation of the users right to privacy. Proper information and an unambiguous consent of the users is missing.
  10. Access Requests have not been answered fully. Many categories of information are missing.
  11. Tags that were “removed” by the user, are only deactivated but saved by Facebook.
  12. In its terms, Facebook says that it does not guarantee any level of data security.
  13. Applications of “friends” can access data of the user. There is no guarantee that these applications are following European privacy standards.
  14. All removed friends are stored by Facebook. This was reconfirmed recently.
  15. Facebook is hosting enormous amounts of personal data and it is processing all data for its own purposes. It seems Facebook is a prime example of illegal “excessive processing”.
  16. Facebook is running an opt-out system instead of an opt-in system, which is required by European law.
  17. The Like Button is creating extended user data that can be used to track users all over the internet. There is no legitimate purpose for the creation of the data. Users have not consented to the use.
  18. Facebook has certain obligations as a provider of a “cloud service” (e.g. not using third party data for its own purposes or only processing data when instructed to do so by the user).
  19. The privacy settings only regulate who can see the link to a picture. The picture itself is “public” on the internet. This makes it easy to circumvent the settings.
  20. Facebook is only deleting the link to pictures. The pictures are still public on the internet for a certain period of time (more than 32 hours).
  21. Users can be added to groups without their consent. Users may end up in groups that lead other to false impressions about a person.
  22. The policies are changed very frequently, users do not get properly informed, they are not asked to consent to new policies.

The Irish Data Protection Commissioner will have a tough time going through all of these complaints. Still, I would argue it will be even more difficult for Facebook to show that sending you certain parts of your personal data “would adversely affect trade secrets or intellectual property.”

I have contacted Facebook for more information about this issue and will update this article if I hear back.

Pages:123456789»

Switch to our mobile site