17th Feb2012

Dr. Umar R. Abdullah-Johnson Interview w/BlackStar Journal

by iSpit

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Dig-4s3QVRA/Tt3_5XCWCcI/AAAAAAAAAPo/Yz2nl6YOL-Y/s1600/UJ.pngNationally certified school psychologist, kinsmen to abolitionist Frederick Douglas and a presenter in the renowned and widely acclaimed DVDHidden Colors,” Dr. Umar R. Abdullah-Johnson was jointly interviewed Thursday January 26, 2012 by this writer and First Work multimedia producer Warren Muhammad of the Final Call Newspaper.  As part of a national tour, Dr. Johnson was on a three-day lecture schedule in Chicago speaking to educators and community audiences on the “Psycho-Academic War Against Black Boys.”  The following comments were recorded on the third day of this engagement, Thursday, January 26, following his presentation to Chicago Public School social workers at the South Loop Hotel. Questions were selected from a wide range of published articles by Dr. Johnson. Appreciation is extended to Chicago’s Black Star Project for arranging this interview.

Raton:   How have Black parents and adults become so desensitized to the pain of our children, particularly our boys?

Dr. Johnson:  One of the biggest reasons or ways that desensitization has taken place is by way of the massive indoctrination of Black parents with the belief that the system has the best interest of their children at heart.  Many black parents especially mothers find it difficult to understand that there is a psycho-academic war against Black children in general and Black boys in particular.  I think that the menticide of the Black parent is actually making them an active participant in the mis-education and extermination of their children because they are finding it difficult to believe that society would be determined to marginalize and harm an entire generation of children.  And unfortunately, until they come to the realization that that is exactly what is happening to their sons and daughters, it is going to be difficult to reverse the carnage because children generally cannot protect and fend for themselves.  They need their communities and their families to do that for them.  So without the community and the family as a protective safeguard for the youth, I think that it will become eminently conclusive that one day there will be no more Black youth.

(“Mentacide” as labeled by Dr. Bobby Wright in 1985 is the deliberate and systematic destruction of a group’s mind and their unique way of life knowing, life thinking, and life being.)

Raton:   How does the five-stage cycle of “Institutional Repression” ultimately place Black males on the path of incarceration?

Dr. Johnson:  I have discovered in my work, in my research and particularly in my own experience as a psychologist and as an educator that the five stages that ever so increasingly large numbers of our Black boys are now moving through during their short life span takes them from birth to a premature extermination by the age of 25.  The first stage in the psycho-academic holocaust against Black boys is mis-education.  Mis-education has three goals.  The first is to teach the Black male child to hate himself.  That’s most important.  The second is to teach the Black boy to love White culture.  The third is to “special educate” the Black males and the fourth is to effeminize and homosexualize the Black male child.  Now the effeminization and homosexualization is an over-arching goal of public education.  It is the job of the White middle-class teacher to break the Black male’s spirit; to psychologically emasculate him so that he simply acquiesces into the oppression that the society has in store for him.  And I always say that it is going to be difficult to rescue the effeminization of Black boys as long as their education is in the hands of White women.  Now, if a White female teacher is not successful in breaking his spirit, we then go to stage two which is the psycho-tropic medicalization of Black boys.  That is the deliberate usage of psychological chemicals to induce a submission to the American social order.   And so the use of Risperdal, Adderall and the list goes on.  These chemicals are used to do to the brain what you could not do to the spirit.  So if the White middle-class female is unsuccessful in breaking the spirit of the Black boy, she then turns to the psycho-tropic drug cartel to induce the submission psychologically.  So first, you try to effeminize the Black male child.  If that is not successful, you go to psycho-tropic medication.  If the Black boy still is a “man child” and had not been broken through mis-education and schooling, you now go to juvenile incarceration.  So juvenile incarceration is the full fledged physical containment of the Black male spirit and the Black male threat.  You see, the whole purpose of mis-education is to make the Black boy psychosocially drop out of his own life.  Mis-education is designed to engender in the Black male’s mind a desire to not want to achieve.  Mis-education stamps out all interest in learning.  Children by nature want to learn.  Black boys want to learn like everyone else.  But what they don’t want is the differential treatment that belittles them, that psychologically castrates them and makes them feel like they are less than human.  To put it another way, the schools are doing exactly what slavery use to do, which is to dehumanize the Black man.  And so when we look around our community and we see Black boys acting like animals, it is because they were treated in like fashion in the public school setting.  A good example of how this works can be found in the “Standford Prison Experiment” conducted by a team of researchers led by psychology professor Philip Zimbardo at Standford University from August 14-20, 1971. It was funded by a grant from the US Office of Naval Research and was of interest to both the US Navy and Marine Corps in order to determine the causes of conflict between military guards and prisoners.  What this study revealed was that people will act the way they are treated.  You become the surroundings that you are subjected to.  Black children act out because they are being subjected to a hostile animalistic environment in today’s public educational system.  And after they come out of juvenile incarceration, that’s when the reality sets in the Black male’s mind that “I’ve been lied to my whole life.  My mother and my father told me; my pastor told me that if I go to school and do my work most of the time, study for my test and past them most of the time, listen to what the teacher has to say most of the time, I will graduate, get a diploma, go to college, graduate, find a good job, get married and live happily ever after.”  They found out that that was all a hoax, a big lie.  And now they are out on the street and not allowed to go back to school.  They have psychological frustration and alienation.  They become irritable and they feel disrespected.  Our Black boys are not acting like this on purpose and it is really not a part of some kind of hyper-masculine personality.  They are depressed.  They are sad as hell, and they are in much pain.  They are dealing silently with trauma.  But they are too afraid to admit it because many of them have egos that have been torn to pieces by White women, by their own families, by their community, and by the media.  So to admit that I am in pain, to admit that I need help to them means to admit that I am less than a man.  And that they are not willing to do.  Keep in mind that the minute slavery ended, they immediately began to build state-wide prison systems because they knew that they were going to engineer the education and economic order to eventually over time lead the Black man to jail which means, in a sense, straight back to slavery.  We still have slave ships.  They now call it prisons.  They just don’t sit on water, they now sit on land.

Raton:   You alluded to this point yesterday Wednesday in your presentation. Are we finding in today’s mainstream society, and even in some notable segments of Black culture, that efeiminization and homosexuality are actually being fashioned and encouraged towards both our African American male youth and grown men?

Dr. Johnson:  The homosexualization of the Black man is the current Eugenics apparatus that is underway.  Every 50 to 100 years, the American social order changes its primary strategy to bring about the annihilation of our race.  For example, in the 1970’s until the year 2000, HIV Aids was the predominant strategy of population extermination for African people.  Chemical dependence was also a weapon. Police brutality was a weapon.  Mass incarceration was a weapon.  And today, homosexuality is a weapon.  Now, most people will ask, how can homosexuality ever be a weapon in the population control war?  It is because homosexuality is a more effective strategy than mass incarceration.  It is a more effective strategy than Black-on-Black crime.  It is more effective than police brutality.  Why?  Because in order for police brutality to work; in order for mass incarceration to be effective, you have to have a life that has already been born.  But with homosexuality, you prevent the man’s semen from meeting the women’s egg.  So you prevent life from being created in the first place.  And even more importantly, the victims themselves actually carry out the genocide.  And so it was actually going back to 1972 when the movement of homosexuality began to be developed and pushed.  So what happens the next year?  In 1973, the American Psychiatric Association holds its annual convention where they vote that homosexuality should no longer by considered a mental disorder.  By April of 1974, homosexuality was deemed normal behavior.  That was only 37 years ago.  So sexual confusion amongst Black males is a very effective weapon in the population control war against us.

Raton:  Our children are born normal like everyone else and, in your own words, “can be successful like all other youth and will respond to love and proper treatment like everyone else.” Where does the process of Black male mistreatment, maltreatment, and mis-education begin and what form does it take?

Dr. Johnson: Mis-education begins at birth.  The first day of life for Black children is when they become subjected to self-hatred and self-hating messages about themselves.  They are also receiving messages about themselves that is directly or indirectly coming from the dominant culture.  And so from the first day that they enter this world, the mis-education and the self-hatred training towards our babies begin.  It intensifies in preschool because in preschool, for those that send their children to preschool, this is the first time that the Black boy comes face to face with the institutions of the American social order where he is expected to conform to the expectations from individuals who don’t care about him, who don’t know him, who don’t love him.  In preschool and in kindergarten, for the first time, you are being given orders by people who care nothing about you.  And on that note, last year, we had a record number of Black kindergarten boys – 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds who were expelled from kindergarten.  Now, what can a 5-year-old boy do, what can he do to earn him an expulsion from kindergarten?  In the 90’s, a policy of “Zero Tolerance” began to be implemented in the public schools.  Zero Tolerance says that we are going to have zero tolerance for anyone who threatens or actually commits harm to anyone.  Every school district in America functions under this ruling where they expel Black boys by the dozens for doing what – for reacting to disrespectful behavior by White folks and other teachers in the classroom.

Raton:    Can you define for us please your conceptualization of “Mental Violence” and “Psychological Terrorism”?

Dr. Johnson:  Mental Violence is the violence that occurs in the mind of an individual when they are force fed negative information about themselves and are then forced to try to obtain some degree of sanity as a result of the psychological poison that has been put into their mind.  You see, the mind is like a plant.  Plans are rooted in soil.  The brain is the soil.  Every seed sowed must grow and bear fruit.  So whenever you teach a child to hate himself, when you teach him that he is nothing, but most importantly, when you teach him that he will never be nothing, then he is automatically wrestling with himself and second guessing his ability and possibilities.  Psychological Terrorism is the deliberate external social engineering of the minds of Black boys to a point of self hatred and collective self extermination.  What is interesting about Black-on-Black homicide is that whenever we talk about Black male violence, nobody puts it in a historical context.  Mis-education is the mother of all violence.  Economic castration is the father of all violence.  If you don’t give me a decent education that would allow me the opportunity to go and get a job, and then even if I have a decent education, if you don’t give me an opportunity to earn a livable wage, how do I feed myself and my family?  I am automatically forced by circumstance, not choice, to engage in illegal activity.  Our sons are not out here stealing cars because they want to, selling drugs because they want to, robbing people because they want to.  It is because they are forced by circumstance through a lack of resources and I think it if trifling that you have educated Negroes, preachers, Imams, politicians who got the nerve to blame Black men for the situation that they are in when they have done nothing to help correct the circumstance and have only by their inaction aided in maintaining it.  In 1970, what did they start doing in Black communities?  They started taking out the last remains of any factory based manual jobs that we used to work at and were able to earn a significant amount of money where we were a able to take care of our families and our neighborhoods.  But now, when you go through Chicago, Philadelphia, New York, Baltimore, you see abandoned factories that have been converted into luxury apartments that use to employ hundreds of Black people.  So in 1970, a concerted effort was made to depopulate the Black community of any industries to eliminate the jobs.  When Black men cannot provide for their families, that creates Mental ViolenceMental Violence automatically begets some form of escape to cope with it.  So in 1980, they dropped off crack deliberately to the Black community.  No one can talk to me about a war on drugs.  There is no war on drugs.  There is only a war on Black men.

Raton:   Why is it difficult for Black people to take responsibility for our own actions?

Dr. Johnson:  Because we were taught not to.  For 246 years of forced servitude, Black people were engineered to only care about the American social order and the slave master.  You were taught not to have any self-regard for you or for your loved ones.  Another Black person was not any of your concern.  And so you fast forward to 2012, and another Black person still today is none of your concern.  It is difficult for Black people to look after our own needs.  That’s why we gross a trillion dollars in this American economic system and use little to none of this money for our own benefit.  Black boys are catching hell everyday; being special educated, medicated, effeminized every day, and we have the economic potential to build schools just for our Black boys in America to fix this.  And we don’t do it?  Where does that come from?  Where does that extreme sense of neglect for one’s own children and even one’s own future come from?  It comes from our enslavement – the deliberate, the deliberate teaching of self denial.  Black people are actually trained and conditioned not to come together and build something unique to us that would be of substantive healing benefit to our children, to our community, and to our future. No, you don’t see that happening.  We come together for church.  We come together for the Super Bowl. We come together to gossip.  We come together to dance and to party.  We come together for concerts.  But we do not come together to build for our people.  We don’t come together and put all of our vast knowledge together to save our people.  So there is no wonder that our children are in pain, are failing, suffering and dying.

Raton:  Lastly, how did it feel to be a part of “Hidden Colors”?

Dr. Johnson:  It was an honor to be in “Hidden Colors.”  When I got the phone call from co-producer brotha Ola, I guess that would have been towards the end of 2010, he gave me a call and said we were putting together a documentary and we absolutely have to have you involved.  So we set up a time for director and executive producer brotha Tariq Nasheed to meet me in my office in Philadelphia.  That’s where my portion of the interview was filmed.  He asked me some questions.  I answered them.  I had no idea that “Hidden Colors” would end up being the hit that it was.  In fact, I had no guarantee that my interview would even be used in the documentary.  And so I am sitting home one day and I get a phone call from one of my close friends who lives in New York City and he said I am at the movie theater watching you.  And I said I have never been in any movies so you can’t possibly be watching me.  And he said, “Well, the ‘Hidden Colors’ documentary was released today at one of the movie houses in New York and we’re watching you and everybody in here is going crazy over  who is this Umar Johnson.  We never heard of him. We have never seen him.”  So that documentary did a lot to bring me into the homes of Black people who don’t live in the northeastern corridor of the United States.  After “Hidden Colors” dropped, I was pretty much known everywhere.  And so that DVD really helped raise the consciousness of Black folk, not just because of my participation, but because of every one in it – Tariq Nasheed, Shahrazad Ali, Dr. Booker T. Coleman, Sabir Bey, Dr. Phil Valentine, and Dr. Frances Cress Welsing.  It was indeed an honor to be a part of this historical sharing. And in fact, it is interesting that you asked me about “Hidden Colors” because I just confirmed my interview for “Hidden Colors – Part II”. So the second week of February, we are going to be at it again.  Brotha Nasheed is going to be coming to Philadelphia for the interview and hopefully with the grace and blessings of the ancestors and the will of the Almighty, we will be able to drop some more jewels for our people.

13th Feb2012

World’s Youngest Microsoft Certified Professional Has Died

by iSpit

Previously, 16-year old Pakistani computer prodigy Arfa Karim Randhawa, the world’s youngest MicrosoftCertified Professional, had been hospitalized after a seizure and heart attack.

She has since passed away, reports The Express Tribune.

She will be buried in her family‘s village outside Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Todd Bishop of Geek Wire had met her a while ago and shared some audio clips from his interview with her.

Despite her young age, she was full of wisdom like this: “If you want to do something big in your life, you must remember that shyness is only the mind. If you think shy, you act shy. If you think confident you act confident. Therefore never let shyness conquer your mind.”

11th Feb2012

Queen Whitney Houston Dies at 48

by iSpit

 

Whitney Houston, who ruled as pop music’s queen until her majestic voice and regal image were ravaged by drug use, erratic behavior and a tumultuous marriage to singer Bobby Brown, has died. She was 48.

Houston‘s publicist, Kristen Foster, said Saturday that the singer had died, but the cause and the location of her death were unknown.

News of Houston‘s death came on the eve of music’s biggest night — the Grammy Awards. It’s a showcase where she once reigned, and her death was sure to case a heavy pall on Sunday’s ceremony. Houston‘s longtime mentor Clive Davis was to hold his annual concert and dinner Saturday; it was unclear if it was going to go forward.

At her peak, Houston the golden girl of the music industry. From the middle 1980s to the late 1990s, she was one of the world’s best-selling artists. She wowed audiences with effortless, powerful, and peerless vocals that were rooted in the black church but made palatable to the masses with a pop sheen.

Her success carried her beyond music to movies, where she starred in hits like “The Bodyguard” and “Waiting to Exhale.”

She had the he perfect voice, and the perfect image: a gorgeous singer who had sex appeal but was never overtly sexual, who maintained perfect poise.

She influenced a generation of younger singers, from Christina Aguilera to Mariah Carey, who when she first came out sounded so much like Houston that many thought it was Houston.

But by the end of her career, Houston became a stunning cautionary tale of the toll of drug use. Her album sales plummeted and the hits stopped coming; her once serene image was shattered by a wild demeanor and bizarre public appearances. She confessed to abusing cocaine, marijuana and pills, and her once pristine voice became raspy and hoarse, unable to hit the high notes as she had during her prime.

“The biggest devil is me. I’m either my best friend or my worst enemy,” Houston told ABC’s Diane Sawyer in an infamous 2002 interview with then-husband Brown by her side.

It was a tragic fall for a superstar who was one of the top-selling artists in pop music history, with more than 55 million records sold in the United States alone.

She seemed to be born into greatness. She was the daughter of gospel singer Cissy Houston, the cousin of 1960s pop diva Dionne Warwick and the goddaughter of Aretha Franklin.

Houston first started singing in the church as a child. In her teens, she sang backup for Chaka Khan, Jermaine Jackson and others, in addition to modeling. It was around that time when music mogul Clive Davis first heard Houston perform.

“The time that I first saw her singing in her mother’s act in a club … it was such a stunning impact,” Davis told “Good Morning America.”

“To hear this young girl breathe such fire into this song. I mean, it really sent the proverbial tingles up my spine,” he added.

Before long, the rest of the country would feel it, too. Houston made her album debut in 1985 with “Whitney Houston,” which sold millions and spawned hit after hit. “Saving All My Love for You” brought her her first Grammy, for best female pop vocal. “How Will I Know,” “You Give Good Love” and “The Greatest Love of All” also became hit singles.

Another multiplatinum album, “Whitney,” came out in 1987 and included hits like “Where Do Broken Hearts Go” and “I Wanna Dance With Somebody.”

The New York Times wrote that Houston “possesses one of her generation’s most powerful gospel-trained voices, but she eschews many of the churchier mannerisms of her forerunners. She uses ornamental gospel phrasing only sparingly, and instead of projecting an earthy, tearful vulnerability, communicates cool self-assurance and strength, building pop ballads to majestic, sustained peaks of intensity.”

Her decision not to follow the more soulful inflections of singers like Franklin drew criticism by some who saw her as playing down her black roots to go pop and reach white audiences. The criticism would become a constant refrain through much of her career. She was even booed during the “Soul Train Awards” in 1989.

“Sometimes it gets down to that, you know?” she told Katie Couric in 1996. “You’re not black enough for them. I don’t know. You’re not R&B enough. You’re very pop. The white audience has taken you away from them.”

Some saw her 1992 marriage to former New Edition member and soul crooner Bobby Brown as an attempt to refute those critics. It seemed to be an odd union; she was seen as pop‘s pure princess while he had a bad-boy image, and already had children of his own. (The couple had a daughter, Bobbi Kristina, in 1993.) Over the years, he would be arrested several times, on charges ranging from DUI to failure to pay child support.

But Houston said their true personalities were not as far apart as people may have believed.

“When you love, you love. I mean, do you stop loving somebody because you have different images? You know, Bobby and I basically come from the same place,” she told Rolling Stone in 1993. “You see somebody, and you deal with their image, that’s their image. It’s part of them, it’s not the whole picture. I am not always in a sequined gown. I am nobody’s angel. I can get down and dirty. I can get raunchy.”

It would take several years, however, for the public to see that side of Houston. Her moving 1991 rendition of “The Star Spangled Banner” at the Super Bowl, amid the first Gulf War, set a new standard and once again reaffirmed her as America‘s sweetheart.

In 1992, she became a star in the acting world with “The Bodyguard.” Despite mixed reviews, the story of a singer (Houston) guarded by a former Secret Service agent (Kevin Costner) was an international success.

It also gave her perhaps her most memorable hit: a searing, stunning rendition of Dolly Parton’s “I Will Always Love You,” which sat atop the charts for weeks. It was Grammy’s record of the year and best female pop vocal, and the “Bodyguard” soundtrack was named album of the year.

She returned to the big screen in 1995-96 with “Waiting to Exhale” and “The Preacher’s Wife.” Both spawned soundtrack albums, and another hit studio album, “My Love Is Your Love,” in 1998, brought her a Grammy for best female R&B vocal for the cut “It’s Not Right But It’s Okay.”

But during these career and personal highs, Houston was using drugs. In an interview with Oprah Winfrey in 2010, she said by the time “The Preacher’s Wife” was released, “(doing drugs) was an everyday thing. … I would do my work, but after I did my work, for a whole year or two, it was every day. … I wasn’t happy by that point in time. I was losing myself.”

In the interview, Houston blamed her rocky marriage to Brown, which included a charge of domestic abuse against Brown in 1993. They divorced in 2007.

Houston would go to rehab twice before she would declare herself drug-free to Winfrey in 2010. But in the interim, there were missed concert dates, a stop at an airport due to drugs, and public meltdowns.

She was so startlingly thin during a 2001 Michael Jackson tribute concert that rumors spread she had died the next day. Her crude behavior and jittery appearance on Brown’s reality show, “Being Bobby Brown,” was an example of her sad decline. Her Sawyer interview, where she declared “crack is whack,” was often parodied. She dropped out of the spotlight for a few years.

Houston staged what seemed to be a successful comeback with the 2009 album “I Look To You.” The album debuted on the top of the charts, and would eventually go platinum.

Things soon fell apart. A concert to promote the album on “Good Morning America” went awry as Houston‘s voice sounded ragged and off-key. She blamed an interview with Winfrey for straining her voice.

A world tour launched overseas, however, only confirmed suspicions that Houston had lost her treasured gift, as she failed to hit notes and left many fans unimpressed; some walked out. Canceled concert dates raised speculation that she may have been abusing drugs, but she denied those claims and said she was in great shape, blaming illness for cancellations.

09th Feb2012

#PodcastWednesdays: #CPOverTime – S 1,Ep 12.5 #ABSI Edition Part 2 w/@AntwanDavisEST x @WesManchild

by iSpit
Play

 

“Listen up, you’re in a priviledged position to learn a thing or two so kee….” Oh… you came back again. Thanks… We can practice our Denzel later, but right now this is the highly anticipated second & final installment of our ( Spit x DJ Nastee Naj  & Mr. Blair ) in-depth interview with Antwan Davis & Wes Manchild… Enjoy!

YOU CAN NOW SUBSCRIBE TO #PODCASTWEDNESDAYS ON iTUNES!!! CLICK HERE

This week’s sponsor: GoToMyPC allows easy to access your computer via you iPhone Try it Free for 30 Days! Click GoToMyPC to begin

Topics Discussed: How Wes Manchild got his name  |  Superbowl Picks  |  Back To “Watch The Throne”  |  …Lebron…  |  Which Quarterbacks look like a pedophile  |  Top Mixtape/Album Of The Year  |  Who cost the Eagles the Superbowl  |  Deacon Reggie White  |  Philly rap sound  |  How Jay-Z stays relevant  |  Philly radio vs Every other city  |  Oversaturation vs Diversity in music  |  John Legend’s “Extra Ordinary Tebow”  |  Rappers with headphones |  Jews run hip-hop (duh) [Note: Please dont take hip hop away from us, we love Jewish people here at #PodcastWednesdays]  | 

YOU CAN STILL EMAIL YOUR SUGGESTIONS, APPEARANCE REQUESTS, COMPLAINTS &  #FML STORIES TO podcastwednesdays@IAMNOTARAPPERISPIT.COM

More musical interludes provided by: Antwan Davis x Wes Manchild Present: Anita Baker Soul Inspiration #ABSI

1. Miles Apart Feat Boogieman Dela & Too Much Raw

2. Get The Money

3. Cloud 9

 

01st Feb2012

Are You Employable in 2012?

by iSpit
Are You Employable in 2012?
Do you have community management skills? Can you set up and man listening posts? Are you an expert at setting up and processing Google Alerts? Can you cleanup, size and manipulate digital pictures and graphics? Are you a PowerPoint Ninja? Do you have more than half of the PC Keyboard macros for Excel under your fingers? Can you write a SQL query? Can you craft custom reports in salesforce? Do you have expertise in a particular kind of CRM software? Can you interpret and respond to questions regarding Google Analytics? Are you facile with FTP software? Are you a master of digital communication in your industry?

These are just a few of the questions you might field in a job interview this year. I just listed a job opening for an administrative assistant and, to be honest, I am appalled at the lack of understanding of how to apply for a job, let alone what might be required to obtain one.

 

Here are a few tips to applying for a job in the information age.

 

Cover Letters Matter — Your cover letter should be in pure text and in the body of an email. No fancy fonts, no images, just text. The topic sentence should be awesome and separate you from the pack. The supporting paragraph should make me want to hire you without looking at your resume. It must, must, must mention the things your prospective employer is seeking and describe why you are the perfect candidate. Proof read this document several times. “I lernt frm xperience that i’m a realy grate receptionist,” is an actual sentence from an actual cover letter I received this week. I have no idea what this person’s résumé looked like, I just copied the sentence for this article and deleted the email.

 

Résumés Matter — Take the time to craft the résumé for the job you are applying for. If you haven’t worked in the industry before, say it in the cover letter and say why you think your experience will apply. If you have worked in the industry, take a moment and figure out what your résumé should look like for this opportunity. Résumés should be .pdf files — do not send word documents or .txt files or PowerPoint documents or anything other than a one-page (two page max) .pdf file.

 

Honesty Matters — Don’t put “Expert in Microsoft Office” on your résumé if you are just “proficient.” During our telephone interview, I will ask you a question that an expert can answer, when you can’t — you’re out. I have no time for people who cannot do honest self-assessments of their capabilities.

 

Skills Matter — This is the Information Age, you need Information Age skills. Yes, you will learn a great deal on the job, but you need to come to the opportunity with very high-level digital skills. Why? Because there are literally a dozen digitally skilled candidates that will apply for this position. They are more cost-effective for me to hire because they can do more for the same money I will have to pay you.

 

Work Ethic Matters — I want people around me who are self-starters and who know that the sentence, “Can I help you?” is the least helpful sentence you can utter. What’s the right way to impress me? “Shelly, I’ve identified this issue. I have three solutions, please tell me which one you would like me implement.” I will do anything for people who approach work in this manner — they are awesome!

 

Understand What Work Is — If you are looking for a skilled job, understand what work is — a mechanism to translate the value of your intellectual property into wealth. This is a non-trivial distinction between a “job for a paycheck” and a career. If you want a job, you are not someone I want to hire for a full-time position. If you have a career, and you are looking to grow by acquiring knowledge, tempering it with wisdom and forging it with failure, I want you on my team!

 

Understand The Value of What You Know — There’s an old cliché, “Youth is wasted on the young.” When you’re looking for a job in 2012, don’t waste the value of your youth. Yes, you may be young and inexperienced, but you have a valuable asset in your age. If you are born after 1989, you are a digital native. This means that you think differently, act differently, and, in fact, are different than the middle-aged hiring manager you’re speaking with. Your inexperience and youth is also a liability. Get smart and use this combination of strength and weakness to your advantage. Our culture aspires to be young — it’s news you can use.

 

What If You Don’t Have The Necessary Skills — This is the key to everyone’s future. You must acquire them. No one can afford to hide behind the affectation that “Digital is for the kids.” It’s nonsense, and it is a virtual guarantee that you are unemployable in the 21st century. You no longer have the luxury of saying it. In fact, you cannot even think it. Social media are being used to “Occupy” places and overthrow governments. If you’re not a social media expert, you are at a strict disadvantage. Facebook and LinkedIn (and 500 other social networks) are replacing email. Google is mapping the interiors of retail stores. Amazon is giving people $5 off of any purchase made by taking a picture of an item in a brick and mortar store and then making the purchase via your mobile device. There is no more analog — the world is digital. And, more to the point, there are now only two kinds of people and two kinds of devices: connected and not connected.

 

Job One — I’m still looking for an administrative assistant with awesome digital skills to work for my executive admin. Will we find the right person? Of course we will. For all of the horrible résumés and cover letters submitted, there were several gems. But the sheer volume of worthless communication from unemployable candidates has been remarkable. If job creation is our number one national priority, maybe we should start by helping people learn how to properly prepare for employment in the Information Age and then, teach some basic job-hunting skills.

20th Jan2012

Legendary Blues Pioneer Etta James Succumbs To Leukemia

by iSpit

Etta James, whose assertive, earthy voice lit up such hits as “The Wallflower,” “Something’s Got a Hold on Me” and the wedding favorite “At Last,” has died, according to her longtime friend and manager, Lupe De Leon. She was 73.

She died from complications from leukemia with her husband, Artis Mills, and her sons by her side, De Leon said.

She was diagnosed with leukemia in 2010, and also suffered from dementia and hepatitis C. James died at a hospital in Riverside, California. She would have turned 74 Wednesday.

” This is a tremendous loss for the family, her friends and fans around the world,” De Leon said. “She was a true original who could sing it all – her music defied category.

“I worked with Etta for over 30 years. She was my friend and I will miss her always.”

The powerhouse singer, known as “Miss Peaches,” lived an eventful life. She first hit the charts as a teenager, taking “The Wallflower (Roll With Me, Henry)” — an “answer record” to Hank Ballard’s “Work With Me, Annie” — to No. 1 on the R&B charts in 1955. She joined Chess Records in 1960 and had a string of R&B and pop hits, many with lush string arrangements. After a mid-decade fade, she re-emerged in 1967 with a more hard-edged, soulful sound.

Throughout her career, James overcame a heroin addiction, opened for the Rolling Stones, won six Grammys and was voted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. Despite her ups and downs — including a number of health problems — she maintained an optimistic attitude.

“Most of the songs I sing, they have that blue feeling to it. They have that sorry feeling. And I don’t know what I’m sorry about,” she told CNN‘s Denise Quan in 2002. “I don’t!”

Through it all, she was a spitfire beloved by contemporaries and young up-and-comers.

Etta James is unmanageable, and I’m the closest thing she’s ever had to a manager,” Lupe DeLeon, her manager of 30-plus years, told CNN in admiration.

British songstress Adele named James as one of her favorite singers, along with Aretha Franklin.

“If you were to look up the word singer in the dictionary, you’d see their names,” Adele said in an interview.

Etta James was born Jamesetta Hawkins in Los Angeles to a teen mother and unknown father. (She suspected her father was the pool player Minnesota Fats.)

Her birth mother initially took little responsibility and James was raised by a series of people, notably a pair of boardinghouse owners. But she was recognized from a young age for her booming voice, showcased in a South Central Los Angeles church.

In 1950, her mother took her to San Francisco, where James formed a group called the Peaches. Singer Johnny Otis, best known for “Willie and the Hand Jive,” discovered her and had her sing a song he wrote using Ballard’s tune as a model. “The Wallflower,” with responses from “Louie Louie” songwriter Richard Berry, made James an R&B star.

Her signing to Chess introduced her to a broader audience, as the record label’s co-owner, Leonard Chess, believed she should do pop hits. Among her recordings were “Stormy Weather,” the Lena Horne classic originally from 1933; “A Sunday Kind of Love,” which dates from 1946; and most notably, “At Last,” a 1941 number that was originally a hit for Glenn Miller.

James’ version of “At Last” starts out with swooning strings and the singer enters with confident gusto, dazzlingly maintaining a mood of joy and romance. Though the song failed to make the Top 40 upon its 1961 release — though it did hit the R&B Top 10 — its emotional punch has long made it a favorite at weddings.

James’ career suffered in the mid-’60s when the British Invasion took over the pop charts and as she fought some personal demons. But she got a boost when she started recording at Rick Hall’s FAME Studios in Muscle Shoals, Alabama. Her hits included the brassy “Tell Mama” and the raw “I’d Rather Go Blind,” the latter later notably covered by Rod Stewart.

She entered rehab in the 1970s for her drug problem but re-established herself with live performances and an album produced by noted R&B mastermind Jerry Wexler. After another stint in rehab — this time at the Betty Ford Clinic — she made a comeback album, “Seven Year Itch,” in 1988.

James mastered a range of styles — from R&B and soul to jazz and blues — but she was always one step behind the popular genre of the day, said Michael Coyle, a Colgate University professor who has written about jazz and R&B and reviews records for Cadence Magazine.

“She never really got her moment in the sun,” Coyle said.

But James soldiered on, and by the end of her life she had made so much meaningful music that she was considered a living legend. “By the mid-’90s, she’s survived so long that people start to look up to her,” Coyle said.

James was portrayed by pop star Beyonce in the 2008 film “Cadillac Records,” about Chess. After Beyonce sang “At Last” at one of President Barack Obama’s 2009 inaugural balls, James lashed out: “I can’t stand Beyonce. She had no business up there singing my song that I’ve been singing forever.” She later told the New York Daily News she was joking.

Earlier this year, news reports revealed that the singer’s estate was being contested in a legal struggle between her husband, Artis Mills, and son Donto James. (Donto and her other son, Sametto, both played in her band.)

Over the years, James had her share of health problems. In the late 1990s she reportedly weighed more than 400 pounds and required a scooter to get around. In 2003 she had gastric bypass surgery and dropped more than half the weight, according to People magazine.

However, until her latest issues, James maintained a steady touring schedule and appeared full of energy even when sitting down — as she sometimes did on stage, due to bad knees and her weight battles.

Even while sitting down, James gave it her all on stage, singing as though possessed, caressing every note like a long-lost love. If that seemed a little much to critics, well, the legendary singer had a show to put on, she told Quan.

“They said that Etta James is still vulgar,” she said in the 2002 interview. “I said, ‘Oh, how dare ‘em say I’m still real vulgar! I’m vulgar because I dance in the chair?’ What would they want me to do? Want me to just be still or something like that?

“I gotta do something.”

13th Jan2012

Manny Pacquiao Accepts Floyd Mayweather Jr’s challenge; Wants 50/50 Split

by iSpit

Manny Pacquiao‘s camp says there is no economic sense in setting up a bout with Floyd Mayweather on May 5 after the unbeaten American publicly challenged the Filipino champion via Twitter.

Pacquiao’s financial adviser Michael Koncz told The Associated Press on Thursday that a 45,000-seat boxing arena being built in Las Vegas won’t be finished before the end of May and staging the Pacquiao-Mayweather fight in a smaller venue is “foolish from an economic standpoint.”

Mayweather challenged and taunted Pacquiao to a May 5 bout in a tweet on Tuesday.

Manny Pacquiao I’m calling you out let’s fight May 5th and give the world what they want to see,” he tweeted.

Mayweather is available for a fight in May at the MGM Grand Garden after a judge agreed last week to postpone his jail sentence for domestic violence until June. Mayweather was sentenced to 87 days in jail, but likely will serve less time.

The MGM Grand seats about 17,000, which could fetch around $20 million in sales, but the larger arena could raise an additional $30 million, Koncz said.

“Why would I tell Manny to fight on the 5th and throw away a percentage of 30 million? That’s crazy,” he said.

Top Rank promoter Bob Arum has told the PhilippinesGMA television the only reason the fight won’t happen is if there is an “economic problem.”

He said the fight “could happen very, very easily” at the end of May — enough time to build the outdoor arena “the fight so badly needs.”

“I will also guarantee Manny’s purse,” he said. “In other words, Manny doesn’t want to go into the ring and just fight out a percentage.”

He said Mayweather is looking for “outside parties to guarantee his end of the purse.”

“So, until he finds the angel, there is no fight,” Arum said.

In a separate interview with GMA, Pacquiao said that if Mayweather agrees to a “50-50 sharing, there will be no problem.”

“The purse is not the issue right now, the date is,” Koncz said. “But we don’t have a problem splitting it 50-50.”

29th Dec2011

#IAmNotARapper Presents: #TheNine Interview Series w/Minister of Information JR POCC

by iSpit

News imageIntroduction: So, as promised we have more new segments to come from I Am Not A Rapper and, unlike the still as yet untitled podcast, this one has a title: #TheNine: Words & Numbers Have Power.  #TheNine is an interview series where we will ask 9 questions of whomever we are speaking with. Within those nine questions, you will be able to have a clear yet concise insight into the mind of the interviewed & possibly be left wanting more… in which case ( judging by your comments/emails) a part 2 will take place. Think of it as the transcribed version of the podcast. #TheNine has many meanings, each of which will be revealed little by little with every interview in the form of facts about the number 9. Enjoy!

Fact#1 – Nine (9) is the highest original number, all other numbers are composites (i.e. 10 = 1 & 0, 12 = 1 & 2, 11 = 1 & 1, etc.)

Special thanks go out to The Minister of Information JR for granting us this interview, shout out to POCC Block Report Radio & be sure to visit www.blockreportradio.com. Also CLICK THE PICTURE ABOVE TO PURCHASE A COPY OF J.R.’S BOOK “BLOCK REPORTIN

9 Facts About JR:

1. J.R. Is the author of 2 Books

2. J.R. is the creator & founder of Block Report Radio

3. J.R. created the documentary “Operation Small Axe”

4. J.R. is from Oakland California

5. J.R. was arrested & falsely accused of Arson during Oakland riots

6. J.R. is the associate editor for San Francisco Bay View newspaper

7. POCC stands for Prisoners of Conscience Committee

8. J.R. dove into journalism at San Francisco State as an eleventh grader

9. J. R. conducted the now infamous “Yusuf Bey IV Interview

1.Historically, stories pertaining to violent crimes involving white people get more attention than those pertaining to minorities (as was the case with Casey Anthony & Caylee), How do you feel about the role “new media” (twitter,YouTube,Facebook, Google,etc) plays in the way news is reported and how this can be swayed positively for minorities?

 

 I think that “new media” represents more of a democracy in terms of people passing on what they think is interesting, instead of having corporate media cram the “story of the day” into their minds. The control of corporate media will be severely curtailed when we start creating, and distributing our own media more, instead of passing what they have created back and forth.

2. Since the brutal police beating of Askia Sabur in Philadelphia, police activity has been heightened in that area, how do you suggest residents combat this without also being beaten?

 In my opinion, the community has to get pass being scared of ”also being beaten”. The slave-masters were able to keep the enslaved in check through fear. We should be more scared of not living in a just society than being simply scared all of the time. Police terrorism will stop or at least be curtailed when we put the message out there that we will do anything to stop the police from beating and killing us. We have to use our imagination in coming up with new ways to expose and stop the police terrorism that is going down in our communities.

3. Tell me a little bit about your role in the organizing of a usually divided Oakland in support of the Grant family & in protest of what had taken place?

The first thing that people have to remember about Oakland, is that Oakland is the birthplace of the Black Panther Party, so there is a certain type of spirit that dwells in the residents of Oakland. My role was a liason between the hood and other members of the campaign against police terrorism, as well as a reporter who helped to articulate and spread the politics and sentiments of the people who were rebelling against the police occupation, of our communities. And I want to make the correction that we were NOT organizing in support of Oscar Grant‘s family, we were organizing in defense of the community that the Grants are a part of. When the struggle starts to just be about a family, then it is easy to kill once that family is paid off or dealt with in some other kind of way.

4. Can there ever really be justice for the Oscar Grant family? Is any monetary compensation really enough?

 The truth is that no one can bring Oscar Grant and the countless other victims of police terrorism back. The money is definitely not enough. Oscar’s daughter needs her father. The money can not talk to her, the way her father would have been able to.  

5. Why was the overseer (officer) who killed Oscar Grant released after only serving 11 months prison time?

I want to make the correction that Oscar was killed by more than one officer, its just one who pulled the trigger and was convicted for it, there is a difference. The others held him down, and made sure that his friends were handcuffed. If the shoe was on the other foot, everybody who was with Oscar on the platform, if he killed a cop, would have been prosecuted. Ultimately the short amount of time that Mehserle served just reflects the gang mentality of the police in the U.S.. They could kill with impunity on camera, and he only got 11 months because of the millions of dollars in property that was destroyed in the number of rebellions in Oakland, that came about as a result of this case.

6. What was Oakland like the day the verdict was given out?

 Tense. We knew that Mehserle was not going to be giving life, but I still think that most of the community hoped that this time, if only this once, the Black community will feel some form of vindication. We have soon come to realize collectively that the police don’t prosecute the police. NFL star Mike Vick spent more time in jail for (allegedly) killing dogs than Mehserle did for killing a Black man on camera.

7. How do you feel about the sentiment that black people need a new “black leader”? (as if we can’t be self-governed)

We need to become the leaders we want to see. Whites don’t have a leader, so why do Black people need one? We have to feel empowered to take the steps necessary to change our community in a constructive manner, it is our responsibility. We’ve had a number of leaders in the past who have shown us the way.

8. Who/what is your target demographic for BlockReportRadio?

 The target demographic of Block Report Radio, is Black and Brown young people from ghettos, barrios, reservations, quilombos, shanty towns, and favelas around the world. The Block Report is the voice of the disenfranchised teaching and talking to the disenfranchised. It is named Block Report Radio because we are taking up the responsibility to educate our own communities around issues that are important to us.

9. What caused you to create BlockReportRadio?

 The fact that there wasn’t anybody on the radio in the Bay speaking for ghetto people’s from our perspective, cause me to create Block Report Radio. The Black people that were on the radio that I came into contact with were always the careerist type, who cared nothing for the community. They only seemed to care about trying to kiss the ass of the boss, so they could get a raise. In my opinion they are like circus monkeys who do tricks for snacks. The Black community needed something, and still needs more shows, who can raise the intellect in our community. We attempted to fill that void in 2003, with the creation of BlockReportRadio.com.
28th Dec2011

Becoming Barack (Full Movie)

by iSpit

I’m not sure how much of this is true… but its entertaining. So I guess Barack is black…again?

An Intimate Portrait of a Young Man Destined to Make History, Including a Never-Before-Seen “Lost” Interview

 Becoming Barack: Evolution of a Leader traces the early path of a man destined to make history and to be a catalyst for global change.

This exciting new documentary features footage from three of the earliest known recorded interviews with Obama:  a1986 WMAQ-Chicago news story about Obama’s earliest success as a community activist; a 1991clip from a news interview while he was a student at Harvard Law School; and a 15-minute “lostinterview done in 1993 by an aspiring African-American documentary producer in Chicago, which never aired.

In the third interview Obama was just 32-years-old, two years out of law school, a professor teaching constitutional law at University of Chicago, a fervent community organizer and a newlywed who had not yet contemplated running for public office.  “… I might think about it, but that time is certainly in the future,” says Obama in an excerpt from the found interview.

Becoming Barack also features rare personal photos; interviews with family and a range of Chicago-area leaders in business and in grassroots community organizing who knew Obama intimately during his formulative years, sharing personal memories and anecdotes; and historic photos and video footage of “Obama’s Chicago” in the mid ’80’s through early ’90s.

Becoming Barack reveals an unseen perspective of our new president at a time when he was finding his way—forming the ideals and principles that would guild him on an historic path.  Even at this early time in his life, a vision of hope shines brightly … a desire to make his country a better place for all people.

21st Dec2011

Jay-Z ‘Decoded:’ The Fresh Air Interview (Audio)

by iSpit

This interview was originally broadcast on 010. Decoded is now available in paperback.

Long before he sold 50 million records worldwide — and before he appeared alongside Warren Buffett on the cover of Fortune magazine, accumulated 10 Grammy Awards and became the CEO of his own record label — Jay-Z was living with his mom in the Marcy Houses housing project in Bedford-Stuyvesant, Brooklyn, just trying to survive day by day.

“It was a very intense and stressful situation,” he tells Fresh Air‘s Terry Gross. “There was playing in the Johnny-pump (an opened fire hydrant) and the ice-cream man coming around and all of these games that we’d play, and suddenly it would turn just violent and there would be shootings at 12 in the afternoon on any given day. It was a weird mix of emotions. One day, your best friend could be killed. The day before, you could be celebrating him getting a brand-new bike.”

Now 40, Jay-Z hasn’t forgotten his past — or the lyrics he’s written over the years about his childhood in the projects. In his new book Decoded, he unpacks the detailed riffs and lyrics that make up 36 of his songs — while examining both his own life and the growth of hip-hop over the last two decades.

He also talks candidly, both in the book and on Fresh Air, about the period in his life when he was a teenager selling crack cocaine on the streets.

“At 14 [or] 15 years old, you’re thinking about sneakers or you’re thinking about some sort of relief from all of the pain you’re feeling,” he says. “You’re thinking about buying some food for the house. You’re thinking about paying the extra light bill. So at that young age, you’re not thinking about the destruction you’re causing your own community.”

At the time he was selling, Jay-Z was also coming up with rhymes. He normally wrote down his material in a green notebook he carried around with him — but he never took the notebook with him on the streets, he says.

“I would run into the corner store, the bodega, and just grab a paper bag or buy juice — anything just to get a paper bag,” he says. “And I’d write the words on the paper bag and stuff these ideas in my pocket until I got back. Then I would transfer them into the notebook. As I got further and further away from home and my notebook, I had to memorize these rhymes — longer and longer and longer. … By the time I got to record my first album, I was 26, I didn’t need pen or paper — my memory had been trained just to listen to a song, think of the words, and lay them to tape.”

Since his first album, he says, he’s never written down any of his lyrics.

“I’ve lost plenty of material,” he says. “It’s not the best way. I wouldn’t advise it to anyone. I’ve lost a couple albums’ worth of great material. … Think about when you can’t remember a word and it drives you crazy. So imagine forgetting an entire rhyme. ‘What’s that? I said I was the greatest something?’ ”

Hard-Knock Life

One of the songs Jay-Z writes about extensively in the book is “Hard Knock Life (Ghetto Anthem),” a single from his third album Vol. 2 … Hard Knock Life. It samples music from the musical Annie, which Jay-Z says he watched repeatedly as a child.

“When the TV version [of Annie] came on, I was drawn to it,” he says. “It was the struggle of this poor kid in this environment and how her life changed. … It immediately resonated.”

Twenty years later, Jay-Z was on a Puff Daddy tour in the late ’90s, when he heard a DJ play an instrumental version of “It’s the Hard Knock Life” from Annie.

“It immediately brought me back to my childhood and that feeling,” he says. “I knew right then and there that I had to make that record, and people would relate to the struggle and the aspiration in it, as well.”

To get the rights for “Hard Knock Life,” Jay-Z says he “exaggerated a touch” in his letter to the original songwriters, Charles Strouse and Martin Charnin. He told them how much Annie meant to him growing up, because he won an essay contest as a child and got to see the musical on Broadway, cementing his love for the show. But, he says with a laugh, that actually never happened.

“I wrote a letter about how much Annie meant to me growing up and how I went to a Broadway play — which was an exaggeration,” he says. “I saw it on TV. It was a bad lie … for a good reason.”

Jay-Z has sold more than 50 million albums worldwide. He is the former CEO of Def Jam Recordings and the founder of Roc Nation. He was ranked the 5th top male solo artist of the 2000s by Billboard magazine. He has also received a great deal of recognition from the American Music Awards, the BET Awards, and the MTV Video Music Awards.

“I grew up in Marcy Projects in Brooklyn, and my mom and pop had an extensive record collection, so Michael Jackson and Stevie Wonder and all of those sounds and souls of Motown filled the house,” he says. “So I was very familiar with the song when Kanye [West] brought me the sample. It had been used in hip-hop previously, but it was just such an interesting and fresh take on it that I was immediately drawn to it.”

0s

“They have a saying, ‘It takes a village to raise a child.’ It changed the authority figure. Crack cocaine was done so openly, and the people who were addicted to it, the fiends, had very little self-respect. It was so highly addictive that they didn’t care how they obtained it and they carried that out in front of children, who were dealing at the time. So the relationship of that respect, ‘I have to respect my elders’ … that dynamic shifted and it broke forever. It just changed everything from that point on.

“I was very aware of the dangers involved because there were people dying [and] there were people going to jail and it wasn’t a one-off. It wasn’t an occurrence where everyone was shocked. It wouldn’t be a shock like, ‘How could that happen in this neighborhood?’ It was really a weekly or monthly occurrence.”

On Danger Mouse‘s Grey Album, Which Samples Both Jay-Z And The Beatles Without Copyright Permission

“I think it was a really strong album. I champion any form of creativity. And that was a genius idea to do, and it sparked so many others like it. It’s really good. … I was honored someone took the time to mash those records up with Beatles records. I was honored to be on quote-unquote the same song with The Beatles.”

On The Song ‘December 4th’

One of the songs Jay-Z writes about extensively in the book is “December 4th” from The Black Album; the song is heavily autobiographical and features riffs by Jay-Z’s own mother, Gloria Carter.

“I tricked her [into appearing on that],” he says. “I told her to meet me down at the studio and we were going to go to lunch. She came down to the studio, and I just brought the track up and I said, ‘I just want you to talk on it.’ Because I knew if I told her [she was going to be on the song], she’d get really nervous. [She said], ‘What do you want me to say?’ And the rest is history.”

On Crotch-Grabbing In Rap Music

“In hip-hop, the music leads first. So usually, you have a hit record and then [the record executives] throw this person on stage who has never been on stage before. So they don’t have any experience on how to perform in front of people, hold the mic — all these different things you need to know as a performer. So you get up there, you feel naked. So when you feel naked, what’s the first thing you do? You cover yourself. So that bravado is an act of, ‘I am so nervous right now. I am scared to death. I’m going to act so tough that I am going to hide it, and I have to grab my crotch.’ That’s just what happens.”

On Misogynistic Rap Lyrics

“A lot of these albums are made when artists are young, 17 or 18 years old, so they’ve never had any real relationships. And if you come from the neighborhoods we’re in, we have low esteem ourselves. And the women, well, the girls — they have low self-esteem as well. These are all dysfunctional relationships at a young age. The poet is pretty much [giving] his take on his dealings with girls at that time. He’s not in a stable relationship; he’s on the road. He’s seeing girls who like him because he makes music. They spend one night together; he gets a phone number. He leaves for the next town and does the same thing over again.”

On Using The Word ‘Bitch’ In ’99 Problems’

“That was the writer in me being provocative, because that’s what rap music should be at times. That was really directed to all of the people who hear buzz words in rap music — they hear ‘bitch’ or ‘ho’ or something and immediately dismiss everything else that takes place. And everything has to be put in context. And when you put it in context, you realize that I wasn’t calling any female, besides a female dog, a ‘bitch’ on this song.”


 

10th Dec2011

Antwan Davis Interview w/Studio Level 3 (Video)

by iSpit


Download Video or MP3 -Iamnotarapperispit.com

Brand new interview and a peep into one of Antwan Davis previous performances. Look out for Antwan Davis 2 new projects coming soon! WesManchild x Antwan Davis presents “Anita Baker: The Soul Inspiration” drops 1/26/12 on her birthday and Antwan Davis – Established Album dropping soon! Follow him on twitter @AntwanDavisEST and get his previous Album “Beyond the Music” on www.AntwanDavis.com

04th Nov2011

Freedom Isn’t Free At The State Department

by iSpit

A State Department employee was scapegoated for linking an already published WikiLeaks document to his blog.


Download Video or MP3 -Iamnotarapperispit.com

On the same day that more than 250,000 unredacted State Department cables haemorrhaged out onto the internet, I was interrogated for the first time in my 23-year State Department career by the State’s Bureau of Diplomatic Security (DS) and told I was under investigation for allegedly disclosing classified information. The evidence of my crime? A posting on my blog from the previous month that included a link to a WikiLeaks document already available elsewhere on the Web.

As we sat in a small, grey, windowless room, resplendent with a two-way mirror, multiple ceiling-mounted cameras, and iron rungs on the table to which handcuffs could be attached, the two DS agents stated that the inclusion of that link amounted to disclosing classified material.

In other words, a link to a document posted by who-knows-who on a public website available at this moment to anyone in the world was the legal equivalent of me stealing a Top Secret report, hiding it under my coat, and passing it to a Chinese spy in a dark alley.

The agents demanded to know who might be helping me with my blog (“Name names!”), if I had donated any money from my upcoming book on my wacky year-long State Department assignment to a forward military base in Iraq, and if so to which charities, the details of my contract with my publisher, how much money (if any) I had been paid, and – by the way – whether I had otherwise “transferred” classified information.

They called me back for a second 90-minute interview, stating that my refusal to answer questions would lead to my being fired, never mind the Fifth (or the First) Amendments.

Had I, they asked, looked at the WikiLeaks site at home on my own time on my own computer? Every blog post, every Facebook post, and every tweet by every State Department employee, they told me, must be pre-cleared by the Department prior to “publication”. Then they called me back for a second 90-minute interview, stating that my refusal to answer questions would lead to my being fired, never mind the Fifth (or the First) Amendments.

Why me? It’s not like the Bureau of Diplomatic Security has the staff or the interest to monitor the hundreds of blogs, thousands of posts, and millions of tweets by Foreign Service personnel. The answer undoubtedly is my new book, We Meant Well: How I Helped Lose the Battle for the Hearts and Minds of the Iraqi People.

Its unvarnished portrait of State’s efforts and the US at work in Iraq has clearly angered someone, even though one part of State signed off on the book under internal clearance procedures some 13 months ago. I spent a year in Iraq leading a State Department Provincial Reconstruction Team (PRT) and sadly know exactly what I am talking about. DS monitoring my blog is like a small-town cop pulling over every African-American driver: Vindictive, selective prosecution. “Ya’ll be careful in these parts, ‘hear, ’cause we’re gonna set an example for your kind of people.”

Silly as it seems, such accusations carry a lot of weight if you work for the government. DS can unilaterally, and without any right of appeal or oversight, suspend your security clearance and for all intents and purposes end your career. The agents questioning me reminded me of just that, as well as of the potential for criminal prosecution – and all because of a link to a website, nothing more.

It was implied as well that even writing about the interrogation I underwent, as I am doing now, might morph into charges of “interfering with a government investigation”. They labelled routine documents in use in my interrogation as “Law Enforcement Sensitive” to penalise me should I post them online. Who knew such small things actually threatened the security of the United States? Are these words so dangerous, or is our nation so fragile that legitimate criticism becomes a firing offence?

Let’s think through this disclosure of classified info thing, even if State won’t. Every website on the internet includes links to other websites. It’s how the web works. If you include a link to say, a CNN article about Libya, you are not “disclosing” that information – it’s already there. You’re just saying: “Have a look at this.” It’s like pointing out a newspaper article of interest to a guy next to you on the bus. (Careful, though, if it’s an article from the New York Times or the Washington Post. It might quote stuff from WikiLeaks and then you could be endangering national security.)

Security at state: Hamburgers and mud

Security and the State Department go together like hamburgers and mud. Over the years, State has leaked like an old boot. One of its most hilarious security breaches took place when an unknown person walked into the Secretary of State’s outer office and grabbed a pile of classified documents. From the vast trove of missing classified laptops to bugging devices found in its secure conference rooms, from high ranking officials trading secrets in Vienna to top diplomats dallying with spies in Taiwan, even the publicly available list is long and ugly.

Of course, nothing compares to what history will no doubt record as the most significant outpouring of classified material ever, the dump of hundreds of thousands of cables that are now on display on WikiLeaks and its mushroom-like mirror sites. The Bureau of Diplomatic Security (an oxymoron if there ever was one) is supposed to protect our American diplomats by securing State’s secrets, and over time they just haven’t done very well at that.

“No one will ever be fired at state because of WikiLeaks – except, at some point, possibly me.

The State Department and its Bureau of Diplomatic Security never took responsibility for their part in the loss of all those cables, never acknowledged their own mistakes or porous security measures. No one will ever be fired at State because of WikiLeaks – except, at some point, possibly me. Instead, State joined in the Federal mugging of Army Private Bradley Manning, the person alleged to have copied the cables onto a Lady Gaga CD while sitting in the Iraqi desert.

That all those cables were available electronically to everyone from the Secretary of State to a lowly Army private was the result of a clumsy post-9/11 decision at the highest levels of the State Department to quickly make up for information-sharing shortcomings.

Trying to please an angry Bush White House, State went from sharing almost nothing to sharing almost everything overnight. They flung their whole library onto the government’s classified intranet, SIPRnet, making it available to hundreds of thousands of Federal employees worldwide. It is usually not a good idea to make classified information broadly available when you cannot control who gets access to it outside your own organisation. The intelligence agencies and the military certainly did no such thing on SIPRnet, before or after 9/11.

State did not restrict access. If you were in, you could see it all. There was no safeguard to ask why someone in the Army in Iraq in 2010 needed to see reporting from 1980s Iceland. Even inside their own organisation, State requires its employees to “subscribe” to classified cables by topic, creating a record of what you see and limiting access by justifiable need. A guy who works on trade issues for Morocco might need to explain why he asked for political-military reports from Chile.

Most for-pay porn sites limit the amount of data that can be downloaded. Not State. Once those cables were available on SIPRnet, no alarms or restrictions were implemented so that low-level users couldn’t just download terabytes of classified data. If any activity logs were kept, it does not look like anyone checked them.

A few classified State Department cables will include sourcing, details on from whom or how information was collected. This source data allows an informed reader to judge the veracity of the information; was the source on a country’s nuclear plans a street vendor or a high military officer? Despite the sometimes life-or-death nature of protecting sources (though some argue this is overstated), State simply dumped its hundreds of thousands of cables online unredacted, leaving source names there, all pink and naked in the sun.

Then again, history shows that technical security is just not State’s game, which means the WikiLeaks uproar is less of a surprise in context.

Most for-pay porn sites limit the amount of data that can be downloaded. Not State.

For example, in 2006, news reports indicated that State’s computer systems were massively hacked by Chinese computer geeks. In 2008, State data disclosures led to an identity theft scheme only uncovered through a fluke arrest by the Washington DC cops. Before it was closed down in 2009, snooping on private passport records was a popular intramural activity at the State Department, widely known and casually accepted. In 2011, contractors using fake identities appear to have downloaded 250,000 internal medical records of State Department employees, including mine.

Wishing isn’t a strategy, hope isn’t a plan

Despite their own shortcomings, State and its Bureau of Diplomatic Security take this position: If we shut our eyes tightly enough, there is no WikiLeaks. (The morning news summary at State includes this message: “Due to the security classification of many documents, the Daily Addendum will not include news clips that are generated by leaked cables by the website WikiLeaks.”)

The corollary to such a position evidently goes something like this: Since we won’t punish our own technical security people or the big shots who approved the whole flawed scheme in the first place, and the damned First Amendment doesn’t allow us to punish the New York Times, let’s just punish one of our own employees for looking at, creating links to, and discussing stuff on the web – and while he was at it, writing an accurate, first-hand, and critical account of the disastrous, if often farcical, American project in Iraq.

That’s what frustrated bullies do – they pick on the ones they think they can get away with beating up … it gets ride of a ‘troublemaker’.

That’s what frustrated bullies do – they pick on the ones they think they can get away with beating up. The advantage of all this? It gets rid of a “troublemaker”, and the Bureau of Diplomatic Security people can claim that they are “doing something” about the WikiLeaks drip that continues even while they fiddle. Of course, it also chills free speech, sending a message to other employees about the price of speaking plainly.

Now does that make sense? Only inside the world of Diplomatic Security, and historically it always has.

For example, Diplomatic Security famously took into custody the colour slides reproduced in the Foreign Service Journal showing an open copy of one of the Government’s most sensitive intelligence documents, albeit only after the photos were published and distributed in the thousands.

Similarly DS made it a crime to take photos of the giant US Embassy compound in Baghdad, but only after the architecture firm building it posted sketches of the Embassy online; a Google search will still reveal many of those images; others who served in Iraq have posted them on their unsecured Facebook pages.

Imagine this: State’s employees are still blocked by a firewall from looking at websites that carry or simply write about and refer to WikiLeaks documents, including TomDispatch.com, which is publishing this piece (That, in turn, means my colleagues at State won’t be able to read this – except on the sly).

In the belly of the beast

Back in that windowless room for a second time, I faced the two DS agents clumsily trying to play semi-bad and altogether-bad cop. They once again reminded me of my obligation to protect classified information, and studiously ignored my response – that I indeed do take that obligation seriously, enough in fact to distinguish between actual disclosure and a witch-hunt.

As they raised their voices and made uncomfortable eye contact just like it says to do in any Interrogation 101 manual, you could almost imagine the hundreds of thousands of unredacted cables physically spinning through the air around us, heading – splat, splot, splat – for the web. Despite the Hollywood-style theatrics and the grim surroundings, the interrogation-style was less police state or 1984-style nightmare than a Brazil-like dark comedy.

Despite the Hollywood-style theatrics and the grim surroundings, the interrogation-style was less police state or 1984-style nightmare than a Brazil-like dark comedy.

In the end, though, it’s no joke. I’ve been a blogger since April, but my meeting with the DS agents somehow took place only a week before the publication date of my book. Days after my second interrogation, the Principal Deputy Secretary of State wrote my publisher demanding small redactions in my book – already shipped to the bookstores – to avoid “harm to US security”. One demand: To cut a vignette based on a scene from the movie version of Black Hawk Down.

The link to WikiLeaks is still on my blog. The Bureau of Diplomatic Security declined my written offer to remove it, certainly an indication that however much my punishment mattered to them, the actual link mattered little. I may lose my job in State’s attempt to turn us all into mini-Bradley Mannings and so make America safe.

These are not people steeped in, or particularly appreciative of, the finer points of irony. Still, would anyone claim that there isn’t irony in the way the State Department regularly crusades for the rights of bloggers abroad in the face of all kinds of government oppression, crediting their voices for the Arab Spring, while going after one of its own bloggers at home for saying nothing that wasn’t truthful?

Here’s the best advice my friends in Diplomatic Security have to offer, as far as I can tell: Slam the door after the cow has left the barn, then beat your wife as punishment. She didn’t do anything wrong, but she deserved it, and don’t you feel better now?

Peter Van Buren spent a year in Iraq as a State Department Foreign Service Officer serving as Team Leader for two Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRTs). Now in Washington, he writes about Iraq and the Middle East at his blog, We Meant Well. His new book, We Meant Well: How I Helped Lose the Battle for the Hearts and Minds of the Iraqi People (The American Empire Project, Metropolitan Books), is published today. 

A version of this piece was originally published on TomDispatch.com.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera’s editorial policy.

 

24th Oct2011

Trouble Maker: Twisted Metal – A Short Story By: Eric Blair

by Mr. Blair

An month after this story takes place.

Next person I decided to interview was Thomas Winchester, Trevor’s best friend. I have only spoken to him on the phone but to see him in person was horrifying. He’s a young Spanish Englishman. His face look as if it was melted off, just seven holes on his head for slits for his eyes, holes for this nose and ears, and an opening for his mouth. He’s in an electric wheel chair that he uses his lungs to move because he only had nubs for arms and legs. As I enter his home with his beautiful wife and children smiling on like they’re puppets but I follows Thomas into his den. Thomas pulled up to his desk and he welcomed me to sit in his fine, brown leather chair. I must admit, that chair was pretty comfortable. He turned to me and says,

 

“So, ya ‘ere ta ask sum questions ‘bout Eames?”

 

I gazed over at him but lowered my stare because I didn’t want to offend him by staring at his mutilated body. I replied,

 

“Yeah. What do you have for me?”

Thomas says, “Ha, what do Ah ‘ave for ya, Ah ‘ave a lifetime o’ stories ‘bout Eames.”

I said, “Oh great. Before we start, do you mind if I take my recorder out and record your story?”

Thomas says, “By all means, ya are a reporter.”

 

I reached into my bag to get my recorder to look up and see Thomas staring at me. I didn’t know what to do, so I stared back. He makes me nervous, not because he’s a trained killer, no. I just want to know what happened to him and why. Who hated him that much to mutilate him then let him live the rest of his life like this? Thomas blurts out,

 

“For fuck sake, stop starin’ at me and jus’ ask what happen’d or Ah kick ya in ya Alberts.”

I utters under my breath as I lowered my stare, “Sorry, so sorry. We can start the interview.”

 

I place the recorder on the table in front of Thomas as I begin to record his story. I say to him,

 

“What are some of your vivid memories about Trevor E. Bigglesworth?

 

He smirks or what I think is a smirk and says to me…

 

Ha, well mate, Eames and Ah were chaps since we were young lads. We grew up in Bristol tagether. Eames was a hot head ever since his father left, fuckin’ wanker, his pops. We always had each others back no matter what. The day Ah knew he was my mate for life was the day he graduated frum Oxford at eighteen and sum Yanks approached ‘im ‘bout workin’ for ‘em. He would only accept on three conditions, the Yanks build his mum a new ‘ouse in the country side, put Asia through college, and if he’s gonna work for the Yanks Ah have to work wit’ ‘em ta. It was a risk but Eames always knew what he was doin’. He played life as if it was chess. The Yanks were jus’ ponds bein’ set up ta protect the king. The Yanks accepted ‘is demands ‘cuz they seen ‘im as two things, the next Einstein and two, if not monitor correctly the next Hitler, Osama, and Suddam all in one person. Ha, Eames is a real cuppa greezer. The Yanks flew us ta the States the very next week—

 I quickly interrupted Thomas as he was speaking.  I think he gave me an angry stare; I am not sure through his eye slits. I asked him,

 

“What was the U.S. agency?”

Thomas says, “Um…Um…Dammit…It’s on the tip o’ my brigham young…YES, that’s it! The Central Intelligence Agency.”

I then say, “Interesting, I never heard about Trevor or you on the C.I.A’s payroll.”

Thomas says, “Cuz we were black-ops, gov’nor. We were the guns o’ United States.”

I interrupted Thomas once more by saying, “One more question before you start the story back up again. How did you become mutilated?”

Thomas says, “Fuckin’ finally, you cunt! Well, that story Ah will share wit’ ya a bit later.”

 

We digress, the Yanks trained us hard for six months straight and another six months wackin’ mobsters, drug dealers, and domestic terrorist. We when on many missions over the months; we ‘ad a solid team. A team o’ seven, me as the get away driver; Ah could drive anything, planes, trains, boats, tanks, whateva. Ya put me behind a wheel and Ah drive the fuck outta it. There was Cap’n Robinson, our field leader, a real tadger. Real uptight guy, he liked to play it by the books. Bobby ‘are, the fastest man alive; he was the recon guy. He could plant twenty bombs under four minutes, true story. Davey Boy, stone cold Iraqi, he was the toughest bloke Ah ever met in my life. Beau, he was the coldest Frenchmen Ah ever met as ya and Ah know the French are sum cunt ‘airs. He was our face man, he knew ‘ow ta infiltrate inta any organization. ‘awk was our sniper, he could ‘it a grape frum five hundred feet. He was a South African ex-child soldier. Then there was Eames, the brains o’ the whole team. Our last mission was ta kill Saddam and take sum o’ ‘is biologic weapons. The U.S. wanted ta ‘ave the type o’ weapons that could kill countries. Big shit! It was zero three ‘undred ‘ours, two thousand three, February, Ah airdropped ‘em inta Baghdad. Eames told me the team invaded Saddam’s home cuz Saddam didn’t trust anyone therefore he kept all ‘is weapons wit’ ‘im. The team killed their way silently ta Suddam. Once they got ta his room the cunt ‘ad two lil lasses in the bed wit’ ‘im, fuckin’ perv. Robinson took the girls hostage and threaten ta kill the girls if Suddam didn’t tell ‘im the code ta ‘is secret room for the chemicals. Suddam told ‘em ta kill the bitches, ‘is words not mines. So Robinson killed ‘em both. Suddam, that heartless bastard didn’t finch. Still silent, so ‘awk shot ‘im in the knee, not a peep frum Suddam. That bastard was the devil ‘im self. So Eames whisper’d sumthin’ inta Suddam’s ear and then Suddam start cryin’ like a baby. ‘Til this day he will not tell me what he said but it got results. Eames loaded all the formula, chemicals, and the strands in this nitrogen box. Eames smirks at Robinson and said ta ‘im, “Good job, Cap’n.” And then he padded ‘im on the back. As Eames walked away from Robinson draggin’ Suddam by his arms; BOOM! Eames put a small charge on Robinson’s back. Robinson’s body was jus’ a bloody Rorschach after the boom went off and in that small time frame o’ shock and awe frum the team Eames shot each member in their head. Killed ‘em all under a minute and he got the chemicals and Suddam. As he walked through the hallways of Suddam’s home he put charges on all the walls as he dragg’d Suddam. Suddam yellin’ at Eames that he’s not gonna make it outta Baghdad alive. Eames just smirked, he was fearless cuz he had plans for each back up plan and for each fuck’d up moment. He is totally a genius, do ya hear me, gov’nor, a genius! He came ta the roof where Ah was waitin’ in the chopper still draggin’ Suddam. As he was gettin’ inta the chopper Saddam’s soldiers came out ready ta shoot ta kill but Eames used Saddam as a shield. As we begun ta ascend ta the air Eames begun ta laugh at the soldiers as he was shootin’ each one in the forehead. He was like a school yard bully pickin’ wit’ the weak kids. When we climbed at a good distance he push’d the button on the trigger and the whole house wit’ soldiers on the roof blew up like fireworks. It was beautiful, all I could do was laugh cuz we came in wit’ our plan and executed it wit’ grace and sublime. Eames whisper’d inta Suddam’s ear, “U.S. is cummin’ frum ya, gov’nor. Ya ‘ave been warned.” He pushed him out of the chopper onta a roof below. We pretty much killed two bird wit’ one bullet.

 

I slowly glanced up in horror of his story and the amusement he got out it and asked him,

 

“Doesn’t that make Trevor a terrorist as well?”

 

Thomas’ smile disappeared and turned into a look of rage. He sternly says to me,

 

“You people are so quick ta call a person a “terrorist.” Eames is not a terrorist. He is the reason that ya able ta sleep in ya king size bed at night. He is the reason ya buyin’ ya five dollar coffees in the mornin’. He is the reason that there is still sum freedom in this world. He’s far frum a terrorist, he’s a utopian. He ‘as a sublime plan ta gives us a beautiful world. The only way this world can be beautiful is for ‘im ta get ‘is ‘ands dirty and kill the “real terrorist” like the C.I.A., Interpol, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, U.S. capitalism, Kim Jong Il, or future Saddams and Hitlers. He’s a beautiful man once ya get ta know ‘im. In ‘is plans, the only way there can be peace is for all the world leaders,  rulers of social class, and economism dictators, all need ta be decimated. That’s what he’s doin’ helpin’ all the people wit’ out a voice and power ta overcum this hellbent world. He’s our modern day Robin Hood, he loves all but ‘is wraith will be felt by many. That’s what Eames is ‘bout.”

 

I just stares on at Thomas in awe, I am not sure how to feel about his statement, it’s almost beautiful in a bleak way. I stop the recorder and looks up at him with my jaw to the ground and my eyes wide. I uttered,

 

“Thank you. Would you have any more stories about Trevor?”

 

Thomas says, “Many more but Ah need ta use the loo. Ah’ll be right back.”

 

He begins to roll away as he yells to his wife,

 

“Luv, can ya help me in the loo?”

His wife yells back, “Be there in a sec, hun.”

 

As he rolls away, I thinks to myself, evening Trevor is one of the most brilliant men on the face of this planet or he’s one of the biggest nutjob in history. Whatever he is bottom line, that man frightens me. I sob for the future if Trevor and company are allowed to pretake in it.

 

 

 

06th Oct2011

The Ten Commandments of Salary Negotiation

by iSpit

Salary Negotiation Tips: Thou Shalt Not Speak Too Soon

There is one, and only one, time to discuss salary in any detail: when they say they’re ready to make you an offer.

What if the employer asks about it before they’ve made you an employment offer?

You’ll want to answer because we are all rewarded in school for answering questions. We eagerly raise our hands and offer whatever information we can. But in salary negotiations, if you give the “right” (factual) answer, you’ll often be giving the “wrong” answer — the answer that costs you money.

Why wrong? The usual outcome of talking too soon about salary is that you get screened out, or you get screened in but lowballed.

Delay disclosing your salary expectations until you know you’re on the short list.

At the start of the interview process you don’t have enough information to know what the job’s worth or what its potential could be. You could agree to a smaller salary than the job is worth.

If you don’t lowball yourself and you aren’t eliminated outright, you may be eliminated later when it comes down to two candidates and it turns out you cost more.

Wait until they’re serious about hiring you. And when are you sure they’re serious? When they make you an offer.

Postponing the answer without upsetting your interviewer requires tact. To put off answering the salary expectation question, you’ll need your own personalized phrase: something you can say with confidence and that sounds like you.

Having that statement well prepared and rehearsed can gain you thousands of dollars.

Thou Shalt Not Regret Salary Disclosure

Oops, I already told the interviewer how much I make. Now what?

All is not lost! Just because she knows your current salary or salary expectations doesn’t mean you can’t negotiate for a fair market value.

Once you’ve broken the sound barrier, so to speak, on your salary, you at least have one advantage: no more tug of war between you and your potential employer about revealing salary.

If salary bumped you out of interviewing, it will be hard to gain re-entry at all, and even if you do, it might be at the price of an informal pre-interview agreement that if chosen, you’ll consider a pay cut.

If you’re still in the running, however, your “disclosed” circumstances make it doubly important to do your research well. In this case, you don’t need to address salary again until there’s an offer. At that point use researched facts about the fair market value for someone with your skill set in a similar job in the region, not your past salary, to substantiate your salary request.

When they’ve decided to hire you, it’s time to make the move away from the number you disclosed to your ideal compensation. Don’t let your past salary be the starting point for negotiations. Let your own satisfaction and joy of receiving great pay be the motivating force behind you at this point.

Remember that what you negotiate now is what you’ll live with for a long time. A minute or two here can engender months and months of satisfaction — or the opposite if you miss this opportunity. Let’s assume they’ve made an offer. What do you say?

Respond with, “I know I’ve discussed my [current] salary/salary expectations. I want to make sure from this point forward that we’re looking for a compensation package that is not just a ‘raise’ from my previous job, but rather a motivating, fair, value-based salary we will both be satisfied with. Can we agree on that principle?”

Once you have your agreement on that, you can return to standard salary negotiation.

Let the Employer Make the First Salary Offer

Employers want to know your most recent salary for one main reason: to screen you out. When faced with many applicants they use the salary as a quick shorthand way of assessing the fit and narrowing down the list. They will want you to “go first” in the compensation discussion and they’ll ask you to reveal your expectations and salary history. Going first is “sacred ground.” Don’t give it up or you can get screened.

Is it ever in your interest to get screened? There are exceptions where your situation would be improved upon by revealing your salary history. But in most scenarios, if you’re qualified for the job (or if you think the job can be altered to fit you), no! Your first objectives are to discern whether this job is a fit for you and to establish what you can do for the employer.

The risk you run by speaking first is that your salary history may scare them off. If you go first, you’ll either be too high, or too low. But since you won’t know ahead of time which of those three numbers applies to you, you can lose the offer by coming in too high or too low.

Instead, wait until you know they’re serious about hiring you — let them make you an offer. That way you lock in an offer and you’ve got the job — and you can negotiate from that place of security. Let them offer you the job and raise the question of salary.

By speaking first, you can also leave money on the table if you’re too low or within the range they are prepared to offer. The best strategy is to let them make the first offer first. That way, you know you have an offer, and you have a solid base from which to negotiate.

There are exceptions to the rule and situations in which it would help your cause to declare your salary history, including when speaking to an executive recruiter, where transparency is beneficial. Try to get their estimate of your market value first, though, so you know where you stand; then fill them in on your salary history and expectations.

Safety or Momentum

Employers use salary as a screening tool. If you have already passed the screening and if you’ve gotten to the point where they definitely want to hire you, not your competitors, you can name a salary figure first. In other words, if you know you have the job locked up, then going first with a high number can act as a magnet and pull their offer up higher without risk of getting them upset and moving to the next candidate in line.

Looked at in another way, choosing who speaks first can offer either safety or momentum. If it’s the safety/security of the offer that’s most important to you, let them go first and establish the offer; it’s secure.

If you speak first, you can provide momentum to the salary offer. Going first with your top number will act like a magnet, pulling up the employer’s offer. If you are secure they will offer you a job, this method puts you in a strong position — it is easier to negotiate down from a high number than to push up from a low number.

Whichever strategy you choose, winning a job offer is the aim. Once you have achieved that you can consider the offer and accept or begin the back and forth of negotiating.

Thou Shalt Not Agree

After months of preparation, getting your resume fine-tuned, answering ads, researching on the Internet, following up leads and networking with numerous people to find the right job, one word can throw away thousands of dollars.

Believe it or not, that word is “OK.” It may be inexperience in dealing with salary negotiations, or just an anxious moment, that makes you say OK. Either way, blurting out OK to the first salary offer can leave money on the table.

Consider what you might do instead. How about memorizing a one-word response that will work in every negotiating scenario?

Think of this as a riddle: What’s a four-letter word that has no vowels, is not in the dictionary and makes money every time you use it with negotiating precision? Give up? The word is “Hmmm” — a single word that buys 30 seconds of silence. A 30-second pause really amps up the pressure on employers to offer more.

Many of my clients have said this is the one technique that has made them the maximum amount of money with the minimum amount of effort. All you need to do is shut up — harder for some than others, eh? But it’s doable by anyone.

The move is called “The Flinch.” It works in salary negotiations, raise negotiations, flea markets, used car sales, the sewer repair bill — just about anywhere financial transactions take place. When you hear the other person’s first offer, don’t say OK. Say Hmmm.

Take some time to really ponder it. Check your gut — are you delighted? Neutral? Disappointed? Worried? Give yourself some time and in the seconds of silence the other person’s offer is more likely to improve in some way.

Don’t blabber. Be quiet. Let silence do its work.

Know How Much Money You’re Worth

Your skills and talents are worth something and you want to get paid the fair-market value when a company makes you a salary offer. But what is your market value? Don’t trust the hiring company. Find out for yourself.

You can easily research the job’s salary range. Your goal is to find typical job salaries for people with similar experience and skills in your industry.

In other words, answer the question, “What range would the company have to pay to find someone like me?” Put another way, “If I don’t take the job what would the company have to offer to find someone as good as me?” Without having this kind of salary data you won’t be able to substantiate your case for the salary you want.

Your fair-market value is not one tidy number, but a range. It is a composite of three components: your objectively researched value, your individual value and your future value.

Once you know the job title and perhaps the job description, you’ll be able to hone in on your objectively researched value or, simply put, the present going rate.

The Internet in general, augmented by your library’s subscriptions to data, should give you enough data to get a fix on the competitive rate.

These sites can help shape your opinion:

  • PayScale.com — collects ongoing salary data directly from visitors.
  • Salary.com — collects salary data from companies and customizes it to location, size of company, etc.
  • CareerJournal.com — has articles about salary trends.
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics — supplies surveys of corporate payroll data and employee questionnaires.

You won’t get one simple numeric answer, but with an hour or so of effort, search and printouts, you can get a range for the pay-level comparison. Once that’s done, the two other factors above should be calculated.

Your individual value accounts for your special training, assets, skills, competencies, etc., that are of value to your employer. Finally, take into account any long-term rewards like profit-sharing, performance bonuses, raises, stock options, etc., that are part of your package to determine your future value.

Blending these three numbers gives you negotiation power. Instead of “Here’s what I’d like,” you can say, “Here’s the range of what others are paid, and why I should be paid the top of the range.”

Thou Shalt Covet Thine Own Benefits and Perks

Geri doubled her salary by negotiating a perk.

The job, as advertised, paid $50,000 to be a full-time librarian. In 40 hours a week, the librarian hire was expected to keep the law library at a corporate office functioning from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Her job was to see that the corporate patrons got the information and guidance they needed all 66 hours a week with some weekend hours. Two clerical employees helped out, 40 hours each, and they covered the 26 hours the main librarian was not there.

Geri, a client whom I advised and whose real name I will withhold, claimed that she could upgrade the two clerical staff member’s capabilities so that they could give much better service all 66 hours the library was open. She claimed she could develop their skills to the point where the three of them could meet the firm’s requirements and Geri would only be needed 20 hours a week. This effectively doubled her hourly rate by negotiating a perk: time off.

Many compensation packages can be substantially increased by negotiating benefits like Geri’s.

Here’s a starter list of possible benefits and perks: medical and dental coverage, disability and life insurance, wellness days, training, deferred compensation, tuition reimbursement, paid holidays, vacation, general education, specific training, certification reimbursement, paid sick leave, child day care, 401(k) contributions. In addition, there’s gym, health club or fitness membership; transportation, travel per diem, laptop, cell phone, Internet access and company car; casual dress, flextime and corporate housing. Consider also stock options, stock grants and profit-sharing. You could negotiate for first-class travel and, for attendance at conventions, comp time off around conventions and other long-hour days. See if you can land office (vs. cubicle) space, administrative assistants and certain software to make your job easier. And potential benefits having to do with if relocation have at least 10 components alone.

Remember that money decisions are best made in the cool climate of logic and impartiality. Give yourself time to think. When you’ve finished your salary negotiations, put all your enthusiasm back in gear and say, “This sounds terrific! I think we have a match here. I’ll get back to you as soon as you need to know. When do you need to know?”

This Is the Job Thou Coveteth

Don’t play it cool.

Most people have the erroneous assumption that in job interviews and negotiations they should “not appear too eager.” “I don’t want to look desperate,” they say. In some types of negotiations, purchasing a car for instance, “playing it cool” pays off. Showing how much you really want those wheels costs you some negotiating leverage.

In a job search, however, people hire enthusiasm over cool.

Does it motivate an employer to offer you less if he knows that you’re eager to take the job? It could, but mostly it doesn’t. The fact that an employer knows that you really want a job can even make him increase the offer in hopes of attracting and retaining such enthusiastic help.

Similarly, knowing an employer is sold on you gives you leverage. It’s important that your attitude is well matched to your natural personality and that it is expressed in a manner consistent with that personality.

Some people are lovable. Some people are funny. Some are quiet as a mouse. Any type can be “just the right” style for a given hiring-decision maker. Hiring is a haphazard, prejudiced, imprecise art — certainly not a science. Hardly anyone is actually trained in how to do it.

This means that emotions will play a big part in getting hired and getting paid well.

This short, real-life story illustrates the point: Bret noticed three telltale signs his currency ran high with the hiring-decision maker. He spoke as if Bret was already a part of the company; he returned a couple of times in the interview to talk about their common alma mater; he said that the combination of graphics and teaching was rare and a great fit. Bret joined in and shared how excited he was about the fit, too. Then he used the “What’s the best you can do?” strategy to capitalize on that personal chemistry and pushed the hiring-decision maker another $4,800 to the top of his range.

Thou Shalt Not Worry about Earthly Economy

A lot of people wonder whether they should negotiate at all when the economy is slow and companies are feeling the pinch.

Unemployed job seekers are especially prone to such doubts; after they’ve been out of work for many months, they are relieved to have an offer — any offer. They fear that if they negotiate, they can upset the trust they’ve built up over the interview process. They cringe at the thought of being told, “There’s a long line of people who’d love to have this job. If you don’t like my offer, we can always hire another.”

It feels like groveling is the order of the day. But fear not: You’re not negotiating with the economy, you’re dealing with a hiring decision maker who needs you.

Of course, the extent to which “needs you” applies has changed dramatically over recent years. For example, in the heyday of the dot-com ‘90s, fresh college grads were negotiating hefty comp packages. Companies were so desperate to get “techies” on board, they would agree to practically anything. Negotiations sounded like this: “You want a masseuse to give you a rubdown twice a week? No problem. You want to bring your parrot to work? Sure, how does the bird like his steak cooked?”

Today, even people with years of experience and sterling track records may face obstacles getting back in the race. Still, that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t negotiate. Just because the playing field has changed, doesn’t mean that you should meekly accept whatever they offer. Negotiations are part of the hiring game. If you agree to whatever they offer, it will hurt your paycheck (obviously), and it may also make the employer value you less.

Think of what happens in another setting where negotiations are expected: the garage sale. Suppose you’re selling an item that isn’t hard to find — say, a clock. It works. It’s not a bad-looking clock, but it’s a common item. That’s like the low-demand job market. You put a low price tag on it, you don’t negotiate, and maybe even offer to throw it in for free with another purchase. Your communication affects the potential buyer’s feelings about the clock, and the buyer may even refuse to take it if you offer it for free.

On the other hand, if you’re selling that great-looking, expensive leather jacket that’s in mint condition but doesn’t fit you any more, you will be a tough negotiator. You’ll pad the price a bit to give you a little wiggle room because you know people like to bargain at garage sales. By tough negotiating, you communicate that the item has high value. If you set your price too low or come down in price too easily, the buyer may wonder if there’s something wrong with the jacket.

Likewise, by tough negotiating, you communicate your own worth. Good companies expect you to negotiate for your value. Far from hindering your job search, the ability to negotiate helps you get the respect you need to get hired for good positions or to get better raises.

Now, in flush times, you’re more likely to get what you ask for than lean ones. It’s probably true that in a tight economy you won’t get everything you ask for. But you can count on one thing being the same in both good times and in bad: If you don’t ask, you won’t receive. It’s never improper to ask. The employer may cry “poor” and decline, but that doesn’t mean don’t ask.

Sometimes asking now will pay off later. I coached a particularly energetic entry-level bank branch manager named Victor to ask for $5,000 more than the average salary for that position. The president said he couldn’t go that high but said that he pays for performance. Three months later, the boss was impressed with Victor’s results and added five grand to his salary. Would that have happened if Victor had just said, “OK” to the first offer?

So you’re not negotiating with an economy, you are talking to a human being who’s trying to get ahead in his/her own career. If you can do the job, you deserve to be compensated. Ask for what you deserve.

Thou Shalt Not Take the Name of Thy Salary in Vain

When you arrive for a final job interview, come armed with three numbers that I refer to by the initials I.S.N.:

  • Ideal
  • Satisfactory
  • No-Go

These “name” your salary and frame your negotiation. Your employer probably has his/her own three numbers as well. Good negotiations will find the common ground between you. Excellent negotiations on your part will be at the highest possible point of that common ground.

Let’s say you’re a convention coordinator, and in your present job you’re underpaid at $85,000. And let’s say you’d be ecstatic at $135,000 — a number bigger than you think you’d ever get, but it’s not a complete fantasy — it passes the “laugh test.”

At the other end of the spectrum, there’s no point in moving jobs for less than, say, $95,000. We’ve named the Ideal (top) and the No-go (bottom) numbers.

Now, consider the employer. She is pulling her hair out with the complaints she’s getting with her current coordinator. She’s in danger of losing an entire $290,000 account if she doesn’t get someone [like you] who’s good with attention to detail. She knows that the average salary for a coordinator is $75,000 for a plodder, up to $105,000 for a self-starter. The top of her range is $115,000.

Your common ground, then, is $95,000 to $115,000. That’s $95K for your lowest, and $115K for her highest. Neither of you know that common ground when you start negotiating. All you know is your own range.

To reach some agreement requires a whole negotiating dance. The step I want to emphasize in this commandment is your clarity. Before you begin serious money talk, think through your top, bottom and mid-ground numbers. If they are fuzzy, your negotiations will be fuzzy. If you’re not clear that $95,000 is as low as you’ll go, you might waffle. In the heat of the interview, experiencing great rapport, imagining friendly co-workers (not the grouches you work with now) you will be tempted to say, “OK. I’ll start there and work up.”

No! Do not take the name of your salary in vain! “I’m sorry, Ms. Employer. I would love to work here. I feel a great connection. I love your accounts, but somehow we have to reach a minimum of $95,000 and preferably $105. Let’s put our heads together and find a way, shall we?”

“00 a Minute” has more information about the ISN numbers.

Honor Thy Wealth and Prosperity

When shopping for a house once, I was told by a realtor that if I wasn’t at least a little embarrassed at how low my offer was, it was not low enough. Similarly, negotiating a salary or raise, if you’re not just a little red-faced at your ideal number, you’re not thinking high enough.

It has to pass the “laugh test,” however. If it’s ridiculously high, they’ll just laugh. Likewise, an employer’s offer must pass yours, lest you laugh because it’s ridiculously low.

Once, my daughter asked for my negotiation advice and (surprisingly) followed it. She had been a star document organizer in a nationwide class action lawsuit with 800 trials pending and mountains of e-paperwork to track, file and retrieve at a moment’s notice. She lived in Manhattan on her $35,000 [= $17.50-per-hour] annual salary. After she left the firm, for reasons other than salary, they ran into trouble. They called her back and asked her to consult with the remaining paralegals to show them her organization and retrieval system.

My daughter and I figured that $150 per hour would be fair. Once they had agreed on her consulting role, timing, independent contractor status and the other details, her old boss said, “I suppose we can start at the usual $35,000.”

She laughed.

They flunked her laugh test.

When you present your number, don’t share a small number; share your ideal. Your “Wow!” number. (Quick reminder, though. Remember Commandment 1. Wait until you’re sure they’re ready to make you an offer.) Your ideal number should make you blush a little (or it’s not high enough).

Make sure, of course, it’s bolstered by a solid value proposition. (See Commandment 5.) Let them know the rationale behind the numbers, and you can soften the economic blow by saying, “This may be just a bit out of reach, but I think I owe it to you to tell you what would really excite me. It’s [_].”

Think about it. Why would you start negotiations any lower?

There’s a curious phenomenon. In negotiations, the first number you put out will act as a magnet and pull their number toward it: the higher your number [assuming it passes the laugh test], the stronger the magnet.

The only worry in going first and going high is that you might catch your employer off guard and the ideal number has such strong magnetism that s/he agrees to overpay you. However, if you feel bad/guilty for taking advantage of his/her poor negotiation skills, you can always give it back! You can always say, “You know, I think I was a little too demanding in the negotiations, and while I expect to be your star employee, I want you to feel good about my earnings. Why don’t we take 10 percent of my earnings and give them to a charity we can both agree on?”

To the best of my knowledge, no one’s ever done that, but just in case you’re too timid or embarrassed to go for the gold, remembering this might help you engage that last little bit of motivation to “Honor Thy Wealth and Prosperity.”

06th Oct2011

The Food Stamp Monopoly: JP Morgan Profits From Food Stamp Processing Business

by iSpit


Download Video or MP3 -Iamnotarapperispit.com

JP Morgan (JPM) is the largest processor of food stamp benefits in the United States. JP Morgan has contracted to provide food stamp debit cards in 26 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. JP Morgan is paid for each case that it handles, so that means that the more Americans that go on food stamps, the more profits JP Morgan makes. Yes, you read that correctly. When the number of Americans on food stamps goes up, JP Morgan makes more money. In the video posted below, JP Morgan executive Christopher Paton

admits that this is “a very important business to JP Morgan” and that it is doing very well. Considering the fact that the number of Americans on food stamps has exploded from 26 million in 2007 to 43 million today, one can only imagine how much JP Morgan’s profits in this area have soared. But doesn’t this give JP Morgan an incentive to keep the number of Americans enrolled in the food stamp program as high as possible?

There are just some things that are a little too “creepy” to be “outsourced” to private corporations. The JP Morgan executive in the interview above does his best to put a positive spin on all this, but it just seems really unsavory for a big Wall Street bank to be making so much money off of the suffering of tens of millions of Americans.

So if unemployment goes down will this ruin JP Morgan’s food stamp business?

Well, apparently not. In the interview Paton says that 40% of food stamp recipients are currently working, and he seems convinced that there could be further “growth” in that segment.

So is this what America is turning into?

A place where tens of millions of the unemployed and the working poor crawl over to Wal-Mart and the dollar store every month to use the food stamp debit cards provided to them by JP Morgan?

It turns out that JP Morgan also provides child support debit cards in 15 U.S. states and they also provide unemployment insurance benefit debit cards in seven states.

Apparently states have found that they can save millions of dollars by “outsourcing” the provision of these benefits to big financial firms like JP Morgan.

So what happens if you have a problem with your food stamp debit card?

Well, you call up a JP Morgan service center. When you do this, there is a very good chance that you are going to be helped by a JP Morgan call center employee in India.

That’s right – it turns out that JP Morgan is saving money by “outsourcing” food stamp customer service calls to India.

When ABC News asked JP Morgan about this, the company would not tell ABC News which states have customer service calls sent to India and which states have them handled inside the United States….

JP Morgan is the only one today still operating public-assistance call centers overseas. The company refused to say which states had calls routed to India and which ones had calls stay domestically. That decision, the company said, was often left up to the individual states.

JP Morgan has been moving some of these call center jobs back inside the United States due to political pressure, but this whole situation is a really good example of what the “global economy” is doing to middle class Americans.

Just try to imagine the irony – a formerly middle class American that has lost a job to outsourcing calls up to get help with food stamp benefits only to be answered by a call center employee in India.

Welcome to the global economy, eh?

But wait, there is more.

It has just been announced that JP Morgan has admitted that they wrongly foreclosed on over a dozen military families and that they have been overcharging “thousands” of other military families on their mortgages.

Ouch.

It is a really bad public relations move to mess with military families.

Is anyone over at JP Morgan even paying attention?

JP Morgan has also been one of the primary financial institutions involved in the foreclosure “robo-signing” scandal.

They just seem to be having all kinds of problems lately. But they are not alone.

The truth is that we have gotten to the point where big Wall Street banks such as JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs (GS), Citibank (C) and Morgan Stanley (MS) just have way, way too much power.

The biggest Wall Street financial institutions had no trouble begging for bailouts from the U.S. government during the financial crisis, but when the American people have needed a little grace and mercy from them they have been less than helpful.


Download Video or MP3 -Iamnotarapperispit.com

So what do you think about how the big Wall Street banks have been behaving? Feel free to post a comment with your opinion below… How J.P. Morgan gets rich with increased food stamp usage.

 

Pages:1234»
  • I Am Not A Quote Of The Day

    Quotes and sayings
  • Authors

  • Pages

  • Facebook

    I Am Not A Rapper on Facebook

Switch to our mobile site