09th Feb2012

#PodcastWednesdays: #CPOverTime – S 1,Ep 12.5 #ABSI Edition Part 2 w/@AntwanDavisEST x @WesManchild

by iSpit
Play

 

“Listen up, you’re in a priviledged position to learn a thing or two so kee….” Oh… you came back again. Thanks… We can practice our Denzel later, but right now this is the highly anticipated second & final installment of our ( Spit x DJ Nastee Naj  & Mr. Blair ) in-depth interview with Antwan Davis & Wes Manchild… Enjoy!

YOU CAN NOW SUBSCRIBE TO #PODCASTWEDNESDAYS ON iTUNES!!! CLICK HERE

This week’s sponsor: GoToMyPC allows easy to access your computer via you iPhone Try it Free for 30 Days! Click GoToMyPC to begin

Topics Discussed: How Wes Manchild got his name  |  Superbowl Picks  |  Back To “Watch The Throne”  |  …Lebron…  |  Which Quarterbacks look like a pedophile  |  Top Mixtape/Album Of The Year  |  Who cost the Eagles the Superbowl  |  Deacon Reggie White  |  Philly rap sound  |  How Jay-Z stays relevant  |  Philly radio vs Every other city  |  Oversaturation vs Diversity in music  |  John Legend’s “Extra Ordinary Tebow”  |  Rappers with headphones |  Jews run hip-hop (duh) [Note: Please dont take hip hop away from us, we love Jewish people here at #PodcastWednesdays]  | 

YOU CAN STILL EMAIL YOUR SUGGESTIONS, APPEARANCE REQUESTS, COMPLAINTS &  #FML STORIES TO podcastwednesdays@IAMNOTARAPPERISPIT.COM

More musical interludes provided by: Antwan Davis x Wes Manchild Present: Anita Baker Soul Inspiration #ABSI

1. Miles Apart Feat Boogieman Dela & Too Much Raw

2. Get The Money

3. Cloud 9

 

25th Jan2012

Manipulation of Prescription Drug Research Data: Merely an Ethical Breach or a Fraudulent Claim?

by iSpit

Pharmaceutical companies are intimately involved in the modern research and development (R&D) world. They conduct clinical trials to satisfy the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) regulatory requirements to file new drug applications (NDAs), prove the efficacy of new “uses” for existing products, and often design trials which compare the safety and effectiveness of their product to a competitor. These trials have the dual effect of advancing a body of evidence surrounding a particular therapy and serving as powerful advertising and marketing pieces. According to an insider article, “For a pharmaceutical company, getting research published in a peer-reviewed medical journal is like winning a stamp of approval from its most influential audience. It’s an automatic validation unmatched by any other medium.” 1 This research is used as a selling tool to validate claims made about prescription drugs, assuage worries about negative product effects, and at times, to provide proof that a product is superior to its competitor. At first blush, selling with peer-reviewed clinical trials seems to be the pharmaceutical industry’s way of presenting impartial scientific data about their products. However, when one looks behind the scenes as to how some of these trials are brought to fruition by the industry, it is prudent to question the ethics of this process and whether it is misleading to healthcare professionals (HCPs) and consumers.

The process of generating a string of clinical trials in the pharmaceutical industry has been referred to as “publication planning”. 2 This consists of a timeline of clinical trials studying the efficacy of a specific medical endpoint. This plan takes into account market dynamics, competitors, and other factors that may have an effect on a product throughout its post-NDA life cycle. It ostensibly predicts at what point in time the release of these publications will have the optimal promotional effect. Accounting for the above factors, a publication team determines not only publication timing, but also which authors will make the study most impressive and in what journal the article will be submitted. 3

In terms of authorship, many pharmaceutical companies employ in-house medical writers merely to refine articles and shorten time-to-publication while the principal investigator does most of the writing. In fact, some companies have drafted internal policies to reflect that this is the proper role of a medical writer. However, there is ample evidence that in many cases, internal pharmaceutical company publication teams, or external contract research organizations (CROs) are shaping every facet of the publication process – employing a process known as “ghostwriting. Throughout this article ghostwriting will refer to the process by which a pharmaceutical company or a CRO generates the methods by which data will be accumulated and analyzed; creates an outline for the manuscript; names a cherry-picked author to approve the final product; and pays that author to be listed on the journal submission. 4 Ghostwriting in the prescription drug arena is troublesome because it can conceal bias of the true author and in this context, where listed authors have contributed only marginally, if at all, to writing the manuscript, can constitute plagiarism. 5

An additional concern exists at the point of publication. It has been brought to light by several studies reviewing the medical literature that a significant proportion of safety and efficacy data generated and published in industry-sponsored clinical trials is biased in favor of that company’s product. 6 Furthermore, there is evidence that there has been considerable under-publication of unfavorable data by pharmaceutical companies with respect to specific products. 7 For example, it was recently reported that a German-based pharmaceutical company withheld from federal drug officials the results of a large clinical study indicating a widely used heart surgery drug increased the risks of death and stroke. 8 This is noteworthy because responsible treatment decisions founded on evidence-based medicine are only medically valuable when they rely on data that accurately presents the risk-benefit ratio for a particular product. Prescription by HCPs based on allegedly fraudulent data can pose a serious public health risk, as well as impose an unjust fiscal burden on federal healthcare programs such as Medicare.

To date there have been no legal sanctions against pharmaceutical companies for extreme forms of publication planning, including ghostwriting or underreporting of negative publication results. However, the scientific community has been clear about its position on these issues for some time and the industry has begun to follow. 9 In 2003, the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), whose chief concern is to address ethical principles with relation to publication in biomedical journals, updated its non-binding uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. Applying the narrowest reading of the ICMJE guidelines, ghostwriters fall outside of their recommendations for ethical authorship. In virtually all cases, ghostwriters fail to meet ICMJE’s recommendation that authors make substantial contributions to conception and design of the trial. 10 It is evident that the industry is responsive to the ethical concerns surrounding ghostwriting as the Pharmaceutical Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) recently adopted the ICMJE’s guidelines as conditions for authorship as a suggested standard throughout the pharmaceutical industry. 11

While much of the scientific community, and now the pharmaceutical industry, has recognized that ghostwriting is outside the bounds of medical ethics, the question of whether this practice is fraudulent remains in a grey zone. With increased scrutiny by members of Congress and a political environment in which the government is emphasizing the importance of curbing fraud and abuse in the Medicare and Medicaid systems, it seems likely that an example could be made of a company involved in a ghostwriting scandal – particularly when it can be shown that a company not only hires ghostwriters, but has also keeps unfavorable scientific data from reaching the medical literature. 12

It is possible to get an idea about how the federal government is currently thinking about the issue of ghostwriting by noting Senator Charles Grassley’s recent inquiry into this practice. Senator Grassley has written several letters to several healthcare players, including a pharmaceutical company inquiring about ghostwriting. 13 It is interesting to note how the Senator frames his concerns. In each case, he characterizes ghostwritten studies as “subtle advertisements rather than publications of independent research”, and noted the significant impact this could have on physicians’ prescribing behavior, “which in turn affects the American taxpayer because the Medicare and Medicaid programs pay billions of dollars for prescription drugs.” 14 In short, the Senator seems to be following the federal dollars and subtly pointing out to parties benefiting from taxpayer funds that the practice of ghostwriting is unethical at best. Furthermore, Senator Grassley also uses language in his letter to a pharmaceutical company suggesting that taxpayer dollars should only be spent on those prescription drugs that are “safe and effective”. 15 This language tracks the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act (FDCA) which mandates that each use of an approved prescription drug must be found to be safe and effective on the basis of adequate and well-controlled clinical trials. 16

Based on where this issue currently stands, attorneys may craft arguments alleging that these practices violate provisions of the False Claims Act (FCA). 17 Specifically, it may be argued that when a company submits a body of evidence skewed in its favor and reported in ghost-authored studies to the FDA for NDA-approval, the company is fraudulently and falsely inducing the FDA into believing that the risk-benefit calculus for its product is more favorable than the totality of the evidence demonstrates and is thus not safe and effective under the FDCA. Alternatively, under FDA’s exclusivity around “uses” regime, one could raise the argument that a company has been granted a new indication for its existing product based on fraudulent data as above. This can be construed as off-label promotion, which has been demonstrated to have severe FCA implications. 18 In both of the above scenarios, products determined to be unsafe and ineffective for any indication are ineligible for reimbursement under Medicare or Medicaid. Any federal dollars that have been spent on reimbursement for those products could be found to have been fraudulently induced under the FCA.

While there is ample room for pharmaceutical companies to defend themselves against these allegations, the current environment is one in which it is only a matter of time before research practices in the industry come under intense scrutiny – the adoption of new PhRMA guidelines suggests that this time has already come. Whether claims of fraudulent research practices will prevail under the FCA is unclear. What is also certain is the propensity for this type of publicity to have a significant negative impact on the image of pharmaceutical companies, as well as an undermining of the public’s trust in the integrity of the medical research system as a whole.

The new guidelines issued by PhRMA strengthening disclosure obligations for authors of medical manuscripts and adopting ICMJE guidelines for authorship is a step in the right direction. 19 While these guidelines have been criticized as doing no more than increasing the burden to disclose conflicts, they do recommend a thorough description of the study sponsor’s influence on study design, data collection and writing of the publication. 20 They do not go as far as banning third party authoring of manuscripts, but they do go a long way in increasing the transparency of the process. It is in the interest of corporate leaders to compare their research practices to the guidelines set forth by PhRMA and continue to question whether their research practices are developing an accurate body of evidence upon which to promote their products.


1 Wendy Balter et al., The P’s and Q’s of Publication Planning, 23 Pharm. Exec. 130 (2000).
2 Adriane Fugh-Berman & Susanna J. Dodgson, Ethical Considerations of Publication Planning in the Pharmaceutical Industry, 4 Open Med. 33, 33 (2008).
3 Id.
4 Sergio Sismondo, Ghost Management: How much of the Medical Literature is Shaped behind the Scenes by the Pharmaceutical Industry, 9 PLoS Med. 286, 286 (2007).
5 Sheldon Krimsky, When Conflict-of-Interest is a Factor in Scientific Misconduct, 26 Med. & L. 447, 452 (2007).
6 Sismondo, supra at note 4.
7 Erick H. Turner, Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent Efficacy, 358 N. Eng. J. Med. 252, 252 (2008).
8 Gardiner Harris, F.D.A. says Bayer failed to reveal drug risk study, N.Y. Times, Sept. 30, 2006.
9 Natasha Singer & Duff Wilson, Medical Editors Push for Ghostwriting Crackdown, N.Y. Times, Sept. 18, 2009 at B1.
10 International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publication (2003), http://www.icmje.org/urm_full.pdf.
11 Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, Principles on Conduct of Clinical Trials, Communication of Clinical Trial Results (2009), http://www.phrma.org/files/042009_Clinical%20Trial%20Principles_FINAL.pdf.
12 John K. Inglehart, Finding Money for Health Care and Reform – Rooting Out Waste, Fraud, and Abuse, http://healthcarereform.nejm.org/?p=416#
13 Letter from Senator Charles Grassley, Ranking Member, Senate Committee on Finance, to DesignWrite Inc. ( Dec. 12, 2008), http://finance.senate.gov/press/Gpress/2008/prg121208a.pdf.
14 Letter from Senator Charles Grassley, Ranking Member, Senate Committee on Finance, to Wyeth Pharmaceuticals ( Dec. 12, 2008), 008/prg121208.pdf. (replies were received by Senator Grassley’s office responding to his inquiry surrounding their ghostwriting policies. In January 2009, Senator Grassley re-introduced S.301, Physician Payments Sunshine Act of 2009. The bill would amend Title XI of the Social Security Act to provide for transparency in the relationship between physicians and manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologicals, or medical supplies for which payment is made under Medicare, Medicaid, or SCHIP. This bill has been referred to the Senate Committee on Finance.
15 Id.
16 Federal, Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act § 505(b)(1)(a), 21 U.S.C. § 355 (2000).
17 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a) (2008).
18 Press Release, Department of Justice, Justice Department Announces Largest Health Care Fraud Settlement in its History – Pfizer to Pay $2.3 Billion for Fraudulent Marketing ( Sept. 2, 2009), http://www.fbi.gov/pressrel/pressrel/pressrel09/justice_090209.htm.
19 Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, supra at note 8.
20 Id.
23rd Jan2012

Porn – The World Is Yours

by iSpit

Fresh off the critically acclaimed, The Roots ”UndunalbumThe Legendary Roots Crew affiliate and Money Making Jam Boys member, Greg Porn, releases his first song from his upcoming project, “American Junky“.  The song is entitled “The World Is Yours” and is produced by Ali Bey of BeatKhemist.  Greg Porn recently shot the video for “The World Is Yours“, so be on the lookout for that real soon.

10th Dec2011

G.a.g.e. Money – Peso x Free

by iSpit

G.a.g.e. Money – Peso


G.a.g.e. Money – Free

04th Dec2011

Tommy Hill a.k.a. Tommy Butta Shot And Killed in Uptown Philly

by iSpit

Rapper Tommy Hill was shot and killed in Philadelphia last night, sources have confirmed with AllHipHop.com.

The rapper, born John Wilson, was a member of the well-known hip-hop group R.A.M. Squad.

A source provided AllHipHop.com with the details surrounding the shooting of Tommy Hill.

The source told AllHipHop.com that robbery was the motive, although there could have been any number of reasons behind his murder, due to his criminal background and alleged association with the mob.

Later Saturday, early Sunday morning, the rapper was coming out of a bar named Reuben’s Marc, which is located on Stenton Avenue and Mount Pleasant in the Uptown area of Philadelphia.

“He was in a bar having a good time and after they shot him and robbed him,” a confidential source told AllHipHop.com. “The dudes he was with shot back, security came out and it was hectic situation.”

Although it cannot be confirmed, the source said that Tommy Hill was alive after the shooting on Thursday.

But he died from his wounds in a Philadelphia hospital, sometime over the weekend.

The Richard Allen Mob [R.A.M. Squad] was a popular Philadelphia hip-hop group in the 80s and 90s who recorded with notables like Nelly and Sticky Fingaz.

The R.A.M. Squad featured group members Tommy Hill, Boy Backs, Suave, 6’9 and Wiz Gam.

The group released albums like Operation Lock The City (1996), Thee Album Regardless (1997) and their major label debut, Universal’s 2001′s Random Access Money.

The album contained R.A.M. Squad’s best known single, “Ballers (Up In Here).”

Despite his career as a rapper, Tommy Hill ran into serious legal trouble in 2003, during a federal investigation into the R.A.M. Squad’s involvement in the city’s cocaine trade.

003, Tommy Hill was charged with selling 51 grams of crack cocaine to a government witness, who was wired with a recording device provided by the FBI.

Tommy Hill faced a minimum of 10 years in prison, so he pleaded guilty to the charges.

Tommy Hill was allegedly a close associate of Philly mob boss skinny Joey Merlino and he had stated that the FBI had been seeking information from him, in relation to Merlino’s activities.

Over the years, Tommy Hill was dogged by accusations that he cooperated with the government, which did not help his rap career.

He was also involved in the city’s first “weapons of mass destruction” trial.

Tommy Hill, who had allegedly relocated to Atlanta, seem to be poised to make a comeback in December of 2010.

His reputation was seemingly cleared by group member Boy Backs, who inexplicably admitted on camera that he had been the informant who had originally set Tommy Hill up.

That paved the way for Tommy Hill to launch a new career as Tommy Butta and a new record label named 34th Floor Entertainment.

He then returned to the headlines, for consistently attacking fellow Philadelphia rap star Beanie Sigel.

In one clip, Tommy Hill can even be seen in front of top Beanie Sigel’s New Jersey apartment taunting the rapper.

In the end, however, the source said that robbery was most likely the sole motive.

“He thought he was where he was safe and it turned ugly on him,” the source told AllHipHop.com. “To make it worse, word is they were like ‘what was this rat ass ni**a doing up here in the first place and he got his stuff on?’ It is what it is. It could have been anything. He told on the Mob.

“People sleep on Uptown and that part of the city. [But] this is the same place Cassidy got into his situation, its just as bad as North and South Philly. He thought he was in an area where he was safe,” the source concluded to AllHipHop.com.

He died a long way from this

02nd Dec2011

Mumia Abu Jamal – The Managers Of Money

by iSpit

Mumia Abu Jamal – The Managers Of Money

23rd Nov2011

I Am Not A Rapper Presents: ___ Podcast – Season 1,Episode 2 – #ThePodcastAboutNothing

by iSpit
Play

Aaand we’re back with another podcast full of random goodies. This past Sunday in our nerd laboratory we had a group discussion about six headlines in today’s media (including the words of the day). Our group discussion featured Ms. Melissa x Ms. Si x Kevin Golden x Spit x Mr. Blair which = Headline Anarchy. Once we hit the record button, this was what happened…

Topics discussed: #OccupyPhilly (& #OccupyPhilly) + Barack Obama + Facebook + CIA + Penn State + Rainbow Ranger + Ringtones + Benches and Ninjas + Spanish Television + Tyler Perry vs. Tyler the Creator + Mortal Kombat + etc.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  

Featured Music:   1.) Young Jeezy Feat Jay-Z x Andre 3000 – I Do    2.) Chiddy Bang – Ray Charles   3.) Matt x Kim – Wires

BTW: IF ANY OF YOU HAVE ANY IDEA WHAT THE PURPOSE OF OCCUPY WALLSTREET OR OCCUPY PHILLY ARE ABOUT PLEEEEEASE COMMENT OR EMAIL US & ENLIGHTEN US… BECAUSE WE HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO CLUE!

T0p 10 Ringtones From #OccupyPhilly

1. Puff Daddy & The Family – Mo’ Money Mo Problems

2. Big Tymers - Number 1 Stunna

3. Will Smith Feat Sisqo - Wild Wild West

4. Jay- Z Feat Jermaine Dupri - Money Aint A Thang

5. Ma$e x Puff Daddy - Cant Nobody Hold Me Down

6. Chapter – Swipe Yo EBT

7. Puff Daddy Feat Jimmy Page – Come With Me

8. Kanye West – You Cant Tell Me Nothing

9. Luniz – I Got Five On It

10.  Young Jeezy - I Get Alotta Dat

31st Oct2011

We Are Young Money Halloween

by iSpit


Download Video or MP3 -Iamnotarapperispit.com

25th Oct2011

DELL:”Was ‘Misconstrued’ When I Said Apple Should Shutdown & Return Shareholders Money”

by iSpit

In other words “Umm… I f*cked up”

When Apple was at a low point, Michael Dell said of the company, “I’d shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders.”

Today at the Web 2.0 Summit event in San Francisco, he said his quote was “largely misconstrued.”

“I’m not a CEO for hire, if you ask me what I would do if I were the CEO of any company, it’s not something I really think about,” he said. “Certainly I have tremendous respect for Apple, they have done incredibly well.”

That could be because Apple has long since blown past Dell and become the largest technology company in the world. Apple now has a market cap of around $390 billion compared to Dell’s roughly $30 billion market cap.

18th Oct2011

Show This To Pregnant Teens: Costs $226,920 To Raise One Child

by iSpit

CLICK TO ENLARGE

A middle-income family with a child born in 2010 can expect to spend about $226,920 to raise the child to age 18, according to a Department of Agriculture report. The cost grew 2 percent from last year, with the greatest share of the increase coming from transportation, child care, education, and health care.
The department has calculated the costs annually since 1960. The first year the report was issued, a middle-income family could have expected to spend $25,230 ($185,856 in 2010 dollars) to raise a child. Then and now, housing was the largest expense. Health care expenses have doubled as a percentage of total child-rearing costs. Some common costs today were insignificant in 1960, such as child care.
In 2010, per child annual child-rearing expenses for a middle-income, two-parent family range from $11,880 to $13,830, depending on the age of the child, based on data from the federal government‘s Consumer Expenditure Survey.
The total cost grew almost 40 percent from 2000, according to CNN.Money.com.
The report broke down the birth-to-age-18 costs for middle income families:
Housing, $69,660.
Food, $36,210.
Transportation, $30,900.
Clothing, $13,200.
Health care, $18,420.
Child care/education, $39,420.
Misc. $19,110.

17th Oct2011

How To Make It In America: S 02, Ep 03 – Money,Power,Private School(Full Episode)

by iSpit

 

06th Oct2011

The Ten Commandments of Salary Negotiation

by iSpit

Salary Negotiation Tips: Thou Shalt Not Speak Too Soon

There is one, and only one, time to discuss salary in any detail: when they say they’re ready to make you an offer.

What if the employer asks about it before they’ve made you an employment offer?

You’ll want to answer because we are all rewarded in school for answering questions. We eagerly raise our hands and offer whatever information we can. But in salary negotiations, if you give the “right” (factual) answer, you’ll often be giving the “wrong” answer — the answer that costs you money.

Why wrong? The usual outcome of talking too soon about salary is that you get screened out, or you get screened in but lowballed.

Delay disclosing your salary expectations until you know you’re on the short list.

At the start of the interview process you don’t have enough information to know what the job’s worth or what its potential could be. You could agree to a smaller salary than the job is worth.

If you don’t lowball yourself and you aren’t eliminated outright, you may be eliminated later when it comes down to two candidates and it turns out you cost more.

Wait until they’re serious about hiring you. And when are you sure they’re serious? When they make you an offer.

Postponing the answer without upsetting your interviewer requires tact. To put off answering the salary expectation question, you’ll need your own personalized phrase: something you can say with confidence and that sounds like you.

Having that statement well prepared and rehearsed can gain you thousands of dollars.

Thou Shalt Not Regret Salary Disclosure

Oops, I already told the interviewer how much I make. Now what?

All is not lost! Just because she knows your current salary or salary expectations doesn’t mean you can’t negotiate for a fair market value.

Once you’ve broken the sound barrier, so to speak, on your salary, you at least have one advantage: no more tug of war between you and your potential employer about revealing salary.

If salary bumped you out of interviewing, it will be hard to gain re-entry at all, and even if you do, it might be at the price of an informal pre-interview agreement that if chosen, you’ll consider a pay cut.

If you’re still in the running, however, your “disclosed” circumstances make it doubly important to do your research well. In this case, you don’t need to address salary again until there’s an offer. At that point use researched facts about the fair market value for someone with your skill set in a similar job in the region, not your past salary, to substantiate your salary request.

When they’ve decided to hire you, it’s time to make the move away from the number you disclosed to your ideal compensation. Don’t let your past salary be the starting point for negotiations. Let your own satisfaction and joy of receiving great pay be the motivating force behind you at this point.

Remember that what you negotiate now is what you’ll live with for a long time. A minute or two here can engender months and months of satisfaction — or the opposite if you miss this opportunity. Let’s assume they’ve made an offer. What do you say?

Respond with, “I know I’ve discussed my [current] salary/salary expectations. I want to make sure from this point forward that we’re looking for a compensation package that is not just a ‘raise’ from my previous job, but rather a motivating, fair, value-based salary we will both be satisfied with. Can we agree on that principle?”

Once you have your agreement on that, you can return to standard salary negotiation.

Let the Employer Make the First Salary Offer

Employers want to know your most recent salary for one main reason: to screen you out. When faced with many applicants they use the salary as a quick shorthand way of assessing the fit and narrowing down the list. They will want you to “go first” in the compensation discussion and they’ll ask you to reveal your expectations and salary history. Going first is “sacred ground.” Don’t give it up or you can get screened.

Is it ever in your interest to get screened? There are exceptions where your situation would be improved upon by revealing your salary history. But in most scenarios, if you’re qualified for the job (or if you think the job can be altered to fit you), no! Your first objectives are to discern whether this job is a fit for you and to establish what you can do for the employer.

The risk you run by speaking first is that your salary history may scare them off. If you go first, you’ll either be too high, or too low. But since you won’t know ahead of time which of those three numbers applies to you, you can lose the offer by coming in too high or too low.

Instead, wait until you know they’re serious about hiring you — let them make you an offer. That way you lock in an offer and you’ve got the job — and you can negotiate from that place of security. Let them offer you the job and raise the question of salary.

By speaking first, you can also leave money on the table if you’re too low or within the range they are prepared to offer. The best strategy is to let them make the first offer first. That way, you know you have an offer, and you have a solid base from which to negotiate.

There are exceptions to the rule and situations in which it would help your cause to declare your salary history, including when speaking to an executive recruiter, where transparency is beneficial. Try to get their estimate of your market value first, though, so you know where you stand; then fill them in on your salary history and expectations.

Safety or Momentum

Employers use salary as a screening tool. If you have already passed the screening and if you’ve gotten to the point where they definitely want to hire you, not your competitors, you can name a salary figure first. In other words, if you know you have the job locked up, then going first with a high number can act as a magnet and pull their offer up higher without risk of getting them upset and moving to the next candidate in line.

Looked at in another way, choosing who speaks first can offer either safety or momentum. If it’s the safety/security of the offer that’s most important to you, let them go first and establish the offer; it’s secure.

If you speak first, you can provide momentum to the salary offer. Going first with your top number will act like a magnet, pulling up the employer’s offer. If you are secure they will offer you a job, this method puts you in a strong position — it is easier to negotiate down from a high number than to push up from a low number.

Whichever strategy you choose, winning a job offer is the aim. Once you have achieved that you can consider the offer and accept or begin the back and forth of negotiating.

Thou Shalt Not Agree

After months of preparation, getting your resume fine-tuned, answering ads, researching on the Internet, following up leads and networking with numerous people to find the right job, one word can throw away thousands of dollars.

Believe it or not, that word is “OK.” It may be inexperience in dealing with salary negotiations, or just an anxious moment, that makes you say OK. Either way, blurting out OK to the first salary offer can leave money on the table.

Consider what you might do instead. How about memorizing a one-word response that will work in every negotiating scenario?

Think of this as a riddle: What’s a four-letter word that has no vowels, is not in the dictionary and makes money every time you use it with negotiating precision? Give up? The word is “Hmmm” — a single word that buys 30 seconds of silence. A 30-second pause really amps up the pressure on employers to offer more.

Many of my clients have said this is the one technique that has made them the maximum amount of money with the minimum amount of effort. All you need to do is shut up — harder for some than others, eh? But it’s doable by anyone.

The move is called “The Flinch.” It works in salary negotiations, raise negotiations, flea markets, used car sales, the sewer repair bill — just about anywhere financial transactions take place. When you hear the other person’s first offer, don’t say OK. Say Hmmm.

Take some time to really ponder it. Check your gut — are you delighted? Neutral? Disappointed? Worried? Give yourself some time and in the seconds of silence the other person’s offer is more likely to improve in some way.

Don’t blabber. Be quiet. Let silence do its work.

Know How Much Money You’re Worth

Your skills and talents are worth something and you want to get paid the fair-market value when a company makes you a salary offer. But what is your market value? Don’t trust the hiring company. Find out for yourself.

You can easily research the job’s salary range. Your goal is to find typical job salaries for people with similar experience and skills in your industry.

In other words, answer the question, “What range would the company have to pay to find someone like me?” Put another way, “If I don’t take the job what would the company have to offer to find someone as good as me?” Without having this kind of salary data you won’t be able to substantiate your case for the salary you want.

Your fair-market value is not one tidy number, but a range. It is a composite of three components: your objectively researched value, your individual value and your future value.

Once you know the job title and perhaps the job description, you’ll be able to hone in on your objectively researched value or, simply put, the present going rate.

The Internet in general, augmented by your library’s subscriptions to data, should give you enough data to get a fix on the competitive rate.

These sites can help shape your opinion:

  • PayScale.com — collects ongoing salary data directly from visitors.
  • Salary.com — collects salary data from companies and customizes it to location, size of company, etc.
  • CareerJournal.com — has articles about salary trends.
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics — supplies surveys of corporate payroll data and employee questionnaires.

You won’t get one simple numeric answer, but with an hour or so of effort, search and printouts, you can get a range for the pay-level comparison. Once that’s done, the two other factors above should be calculated.

Your individual value accounts for your special training, assets, skills, competencies, etc., that are of value to your employer. Finally, take into account any long-term rewards like profit-sharing, performance bonuses, raises, stock options, etc., that are part of your package to determine your future value.

Blending these three numbers gives you negotiation power. Instead of “Here’s what I’d like,” you can say, “Here’s the range of what others are paid, and why I should be paid the top of the range.”

Thou Shalt Covet Thine Own Benefits and Perks

Geri doubled her salary by negotiating a perk.

The job, as advertised, paid $50,000 to be a full-time librarian. In 40 hours a week, the librarian hire was expected to keep the law library at a corporate office functioning from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Her job was to see that the corporate patrons got the information and guidance they needed all 66 hours a week with some weekend hours. Two clerical employees helped out, 40 hours each, and they covered the 26 hours the main librarian was not there.

Geri, a client whom I advised and whose real name I will withhold, claimed that she could upgrade the two clerical staff member’s capabilities so that they could give much better service all 66 hours the library was open. She claimed she could develop their skills to the point where the three of them could meet the firm’s requirements and Geri would only be needed 20 hours a week. This effectively doubled her hourly rate by negotiating a perk: time off.

Many compensation packages can be substantially increased by negotiating benefits like Geri’s.

Here’s a starter list of possible benefits and perks: medical and dental coverage, disability and life insurance, wellness days, training, deferred compensation, tuition reimbursement, paid holidays, vacation, general education, specific training, certification reimbursement, paid sick leave, child day care, 401(k) contributions. In addition, there’s gym, health club or fitness membership; transportation, travel per diem, laptop, cell phone, Internet access and company car; casual dress, flextime and corporate housing. Consider also stock options, stock grants and profit-sharing. You could negotiate for first-class travel and, for attendance at conventions, comp time off around conventions and other long-hour days. See if you can land office (vs. cubicle) space, administrative assistants and certain software to make your job easier. And potential benefits having to do with if relocation have at least 10 components alone.

Remember that money decisions are best made in the cool climate of logic and impartiality. Give yourself time to think. When you’ve finished your salary negotiations, put all your enthusiasm back in gear and say, “This sounds terrific! I think we have a match here. I’ll get back to you as soon as you need to know. When do you need to know?”

This Is the Job Thou Coveteth

Don’t play it cool.

Most people have the erroneous assumption that in job interviews and negotiations they should “not appear too eager.” “I don’t want to look desperate,” they say. In some types of negotiations, purchasing a car for instance, “playing it cool” pays off. Showing how much you really want those wheels costs you some negotiating leverage.

In a job search, however, people hire enthusiasm over cool.

Does it motivate an employer to offer you less if he knows that you’re eager to take the job? It could, but mostly it doesn’t. The fact that an employer knows that you really want a job can even make him increase the offer in hopes of attracting and retaining such enthusiastic help.

Similarly, knowing an employer is sold on you gives you leverage. It’s important that your attitude is well matched to your natural personality and that it is expressed in a manner consistent with that personality.

Some people are lovable. Some people are funny. Some are quiet as a mouse. Any type can be “just the right” style for a given hiring-decision maker. Hiring is a haphazard, prejudiced, imprecise art — certainly not a science. Hardly anyone is actually trained in how to do it.

This means that emotions will play a big part in getting hired and getting paid well.

This short, real-life story illustrates the point: Bret noticed three telltale signs his currency ran high with the hiring-decision maker. He spoke as if Bret was already a part of the company; he returned a couple of times in the interview to talk about their common alma mater; he said that the combination of graphics and teaching was rare and a great fit. Bret joined in and shared how excited he was about the fit, too. Then he used the “What’s the best you can do?” strategy to capitalize on that personal chemistry and pushed the hiring-decision maker another $4,800 to the top of his range.

Thou Shalt Not Worry about Earthly Economy

A lot of people wonder whether they should negotiate at all when the economy is slow and companies are feeling the pinch.

Unemployed job seekers are especially prone to such doubts; after they’ve been out of work for many months, they are relieved to have an offer — any offer. They fear that if they negotiate, they can upset the trust they’ve built up over the interview process. They cringe at the thought of being told, “There’s a long line of people who’d love to have this job. If you don’t like my offer, we can always hire another.”

It feels like groveling is the order of the day. But fear not: You’re not negotiating with the economy, you’re dealing with a hiring decision maker who needs you.

Of course, the extent to which “needs you” applies has changed dramatically over recent years. For example, in the heyday of the dot-com ‘90s, fresh college grads were negotiating hefty comp packages. Companies were so desperate to get “techies” on board, they would agree to practically anything. Negotiations sounded like this: “You want a masseuse to give you a rubdown twice a week? No problem. You want to bring your parrot to work? Sure, how does the bird like his steak cooked?”

Today, even people with years of experience and sterling track records may face obstacles getting back in the race. Still, that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t negotiate. Just because the playing field has changed, doesn’t mean that you should meekly accept whatever they offer. Negotiations are part of the hiring game. If you agree to whatever they offer, it will hurt your paycheck (obviously), and it may also make the employer value you less.

Think of what happens in another setting where negotiations are expected: the garage sale. Suppose you’re selling an item that isn’t hard to find — say, a clock. It works. It’s not a bad-looking clock, but it’s a common item. That’s like the low-demand job market. You put a low price tag on it, you don’t negotiate, and maybe even offer to throw it in for free with another purchase. Your communication affects the potential buyer’s feelings about the clock, and the buyer may even refuse to take it if you offer it for free.

On the other hand, if you’re selling that great-looking, expensive leather jacket that’s in mint condition but doesn’t fit you any more, you will be a tough negotiator. You’ll pad the price a bit to give you a little wiggle room because you know people like to bargain at garage sales. By tough negotiating, you communicate that the item has high value. If you set your price too low or come down in price too easily, the buyer may wonder if there’s something wrong with the jacket.

Likewise, by tough negotiating, you communicate your own worth. Good companies expect you to negotiate for your value. Far from hindering your job search, the ability to negotiate helps you get the respect you need to get hired for good positions or to get better raises.

Now, in flush times, you’re more likely to get what you ask for than lean ones. It’s probably true that in a tight economy you won’t get everything you ask for. But you can count on one thing being the same in both good times and in bad: If you don’t ask, you won’t receive. It’s never improper to ask. The employer may cry “poor” and decline, but that doesn’t mean don’t ask.

Sometimes asking now will pay off later. I coached a particularly energetic entry-level bank branch manager named Victor to ask for $5,000 more than the average salary for that position. The president said he couldn’t go that high but said that he pays for performance. Three months later, the boss was impressed with Victor’s results and added five grand to his salary. Would that have happened if Victor had just said, “OK” to the first offer?

So you’re not negotiating with an economy, you are talking to a human being who’s trying to get ahead in his/her own career. If you can do the job, you deserve to be compensated. Ask for what you deserve.

Thou Shalt Not Take the Name of Thy Salary in Vain

When you arrive for a final job interview, come armed with three numbers that I refer to by the initials I.S.N.:

  • Ideal
  • Satisfactory
  • No-Go

These “name” your salary and frame your negotiation. Your employer probably has his/her own three numbers as well. Good negotiations will find the common ground between you. Excellent negotiations on your part will be at the highest possible point of that common ground.

Let’s say you’re a convention coordinator, and in your present job you’re underpaid at $85,000. And let’s say you’d be ecstatic at $135,000 — a number bigger than you think you’d ever get, but it’s not a complete fantasy — it passes the “laugh test.”

At the other end of the spectrum, there’s no point in moving jobs for less than, say, $95,000. We’ve named the Ideal (top) and the No-go (bottom) numbers.

Now, consider the employer. She is pulling her hair out with the complaints she’s getting with her current coordinator. She’s in danger of losing an entire $290,000 account if she doesn’t get someone [like you] who’s good with attention to detail. She knows that the average salary for a coordinator is $75,000 for a plodder, up to $105,000 for a self-starter. The top of her range is $115,000.

Your common ground, then, is $95,000 to $115,000. That’s $95K for your lowest, and $115K for her highest. Neither of you know that common ground when you start negotiating. All you know is your own range.

To reach some agreement requires a whole negotiating dance. The step I want to emphasize in this commandment is your clarity. Before you begin serious money talk, think through your top, bottom and mid-ground numbers. If they are fuzzy, your negotiations will be fuzzy. If you’re not clear that $95,000 is as low as you’ll go, you might waffle. In the heat of the interview, experiencing great rapport, imagining friendly co-workers (not the grouches you work with now) you will be tempted to say, “OK. I’ll start there and work up.”

No! Do not take the name of your salary in vain! “I’m sorry, Ms. Employer. I would love to work here. I feel a great connection. I love your accounts, but somehow we have to reach a minimum of $95,000 and preferably $105. Let’s put our heads together and find a way, shall we?”

“00 a Minute” has more information about the ISN numbers.

Honor Thy Wealth and Prosperity

When shopping for a house once, I was told by a realtor that if I wasn’t at least a little embarrassed at how low my offer was, it was not low enough. Similarly, negotiating a salary or raise, if you’re not just a little red-faced at your ideal number, you’re not thinking high enough.

It has to pass the “laugh test,” however. If it’s ridiculously high, they’ll just laugh. Likewise, an employer’s offer must pass yours, lest you laugh because it’s ridiculously low.

Once, my daughter asked for my negotiation advice and (surprisingly) followed it. She had been a star document organizer in a nationwide class action lawsuit with 800 trials pending and mountains of e-paperwork to track, file and retrieve at a moment’s notice. She lived in Manhattan on her $35,000 [= $17.50-per-hour] annual salary. After she left the firm, for reasons other than salary, they ran into trouble. They called her back and asked her to consult with the remaining paralegals to show them her organization and retrieval system.

My daughter and I figured that $150 per hour would be fair. Once they had agreed on her consulting role, timing, independent contractor status and the other details, her old boss said, “I suppose we can start at the usual $35,000.”

She laughed.

They flunked her laugh test.

When you present your number, don’t share a small number; share your ideal. Your “Wow!” number. (Quick reminder, though. Remember Commandment 1. Wait until you’re sure they’re ready to make you an offer.) Your ideal number should make you blush a little (or it’s not high enough).

Make sure, of course, it’s bolstered by a solid value proposition. (See Commandment 5.) Let them know the rationale behind the numbers, and you can soften the economic blow by saying, “This may be just a bit out of reach, but I think I owe it to you to tell you what would really excite me. It’s [_].”

Think about it. Why would you start negotiations any lower?

There’s a curious phenomenon. In negotiations, the first number you put out will act as a magnet and pull their number toward it: the higher your number [assuming it passes the laugh test], the stronger the magnet.

The only worry in going first and going high is that you might catch your employer off guard and the ideal number has such strong magnetism that s/he agrees to overpay you. However, if you feel bad/guilty for taking advantage of his/her poor negotiation skills, you can always give it back! You can always say, “You know, I think I was a little too demanding in the negotiations, and while I expect to be your star employee, I want you to feel good about my earnings. Why don’t we take 10 percent of my earnings and give them to a charity we can both agree on?”

To the best of my knowledge, no one’s ever done that, but just in case you’re too timid or embarrassed to go for the gold, remembering this might help you engage that last little bit of motivation to “Honor Thy Wealth and Prosperity.”

21st Sep2011

Gage Money – Suicide Note (Video)

by iSpit

Suicide Note By G.A.G.E from Ampm Films on Vimeo.

28th Aug2011

Gage Money – Im The One On Fire Now (Music Video)

by iSpit

Im The One On Fire Now from Ampm Films on Vimeo.

16th Aug2011

Gage Money – Amy Winehouse

by iSpit

Too soon?

011 FREE DOWNLOAD #TEAMAMPM by J-LEAKS

Pages:123»
  • I Am Not A Quote Of The Day

    Quotes and sayings
  • Authors

  • Pages

  • Facebook

    I Am Not A Rapper on Facebook

Switch to our mobile site